stevenpiziks: (Default)
 Voting by mail and early voting are set to begin soon. The Hopium Chronicles has some good advice, worth sharing here:

–Vote the minute you can. If you vote in person, vote the first day you’re allowed to. If you vote by mail, vote as soon as your ballot arrives and then return it in person to a drop box to avoid post office delays (intentional or otherwise).

–After you vote, check online to make sure your vote was received and has been recorded. If it hasn’t, contact the Secretary of State’s office and find out what happened and how to fix it.

–There are three reasons to vote early. 1) Because the parties check the voting lists every day and cross off people who have voted. That means they can concentrate on the low-propensity voters (and save money and time by not concentrating on you.) 2) It makes it more difficult for Trump and his thugs to cheat and/or interfere with your vote. 3) It runs up the score, making it harder for Republicans to swamp the polls on the actual election day. And 4) The news that Democrats are outnumbering the Republicans in voting causes Republicans to give up and/or despair and maybe decide not to vote while making Democrats get enthusiastic and decide to vote. (It’s called the bandwagon effect.)
stevenpiziks: (Default)
 Indiana authorities investigated the woman who falsely reported Pete Buttigieg to the police for child abuse and decided not to press charges. The reason? She is deeply mentally ill, abuses drugs and alcohol, and suffers from paranoid delusions. The authorities basically decided she wasn't competent enough to stand trial.

Hmmmm . . . Okay. This woman is already in a prison more miserable than any real one. I'm not sure if the Buttigieg family would be able to forgive her (or if =I= would, if she had put me through something like this), nor do I feel they should be required to forgive her. I do, however, understand the authorities' thinking on this. Sort of. Mostly.

But I =do= believe that the POLICE should be investigated and prosecuted. This woman called the police in Indiana, and, based on a brief 911 call and no follow-up whatsoever, they alerted the police in Michigan to a supposed case of CSA EVEN THOUGH THEY KNEW THIS WOMAN HAD A HISTORY OF DELUSIONS AND DRUG ABUSE.

The Michigan police rushed over to the Buttigieg home and took the children away from their parents, again without a shred of follow-up. Yes, CPS is required to act on information they get, but they are also expected to investigate properly before breaking a family apart, even temporarily, and a cursory check would have revealed (actually, did reveal) that the accusations were nothing but literal paranoid delusion.

CPS are NOT allowed to take children away from their parents based on an unfounded, uninvestigated accusation. At absolute minimum, CPS should have interviewed the accuser before acting. Had they done so, they would have realized within five minutes that this woman wasn't in her right mind. They did not do this, and they ripped a family apart and put them through a nightmare of terror.

The police in Indiana, the police in Michigan, and Child Protective Services need to be investigated and prosecuted. And a big part of the investigation needs to focus on homophobia. It seems pretty clear that the only reason Traverse City's CPS so blatantly violated basic procedure to go after the Buttigiegs is that they're a same-sex couple. Although Michigan's Elliot Larson Civil Rights Act includes protections for LGBTQ+ people, northern Michigan is notoriously homophobic, and it would absolutely be on point for the authorities up there to go after the Buttigieg family because they hate gay men.

Fortunately, Michigan AG Dana Nessel is a formidable presence, and although Indiana has stopped investigating (without, I might add, looking into the police violation of basic procedure), Nessel has not.

I hope she holds the cops and CPS workers to account. You can tell me that cops and CPS workers are overworked and underpaid all you want. You will never convince me that the people who tortured the Buttigieg family are anything but filthy, evil animals who willingly and deliberately caused an innocent family great pain. They should be put in the same jail cell they wanted to put the Buttigiegs into.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/09/08/woman-who-made-false-child-welfare-report-about-buttigieg-wont-be-prosecuted/
stevenpiziks: (Default)
I just saw a recipe post that was for a pie that included apples, figs, and raisins in equal portions. The very first comment was from someone who said they didn't like figs or raisins, and could the OP give instruction on making the recipe without them?
Argh.
Recipe posts seem to get certain flavors of comments, so to speak. We get Kevin and Kathy Killjoy:
"Yuck! Why would you make this with cheese?"
"It looks like something a goat threw up."
"I'm lactose intolerant, so I can't even LOOK at this without getting diarrhea."
Then we get Sue and Stanly Sycophant who comment five minutes after the original post on a recipe that takes two hours to make:
"I just made this, and it's fantastic!"
"This is so easy to make. My kids loved it!"
"I took this to a party just now and everyone devoured it!"
And we have Substitution Sally and Sammy:
"Can you use baking powder instead of baking soda?"
"Would it work to use green bananas instead of ripe ones?"
"What about using carrots instead of steak?"
We also have Do-It-For-Me Darla and Danny:
"Please post a kosher version of your shrimp-and-bacon wraps so I can make it for my in-laws."
"Could you repost this for the microwave? My oven is broken."
"Can you redo this chocolate cake recipe so it doesn't use sugar, flour, eggs, milk, or chocolate?"
Dearie, dearie me.
stevenpiziks: (Default)
 In about an hour, the new Republican National Convention will convene in Texas. GOP politicians were told they'd have to pay $25,000 to attend, with add-on charges for things like face-time or photos with the president.

Not to anyone's surprise, advance ticket sales have been sparse. An amazingly large number of politicians regretfully announced they had other obligations this week.

Also, the RNC tried to charge the unwashed masses to attend. The Texas GOP demanded between $5,000 and $20,000. Virginia offered access for as little as $1,000. Other states charged somewhere in between. Because everyone knows the unwashed masses are flush with cash these days.

Ticket sales were sparse. Huh. Imagine!

Desperate to fill auditorium seats, the RNC opened a free-ticket lottery to the general public. A couple days ago, it turned out that so few people were putting in for the lottery that the RNC was approving tickets to anyone who asked.

Now I've learned that if you have one of those free tickets, you are required to leave your car at a public park several miles away from the convention center and take a shuttle bus (called the GOP Express). The drive is about half an hour each way. Also, the bus will not run between 5 PM and 9 PM on the two convention days, and ride-shares and taxis are banned from the area around the convention center. The convention begins at 3 PM and ends at 9 PM each day, so once you're at the convention, you're there to stay for the day, and if you're late getting to the park, you're SOL. And at the end of the day, you'll face a long, long line of people showing up all at once for the shuttle bus back to their cars.

Well, at least you got in for free.

https://www.fox4news.com/news/republican-midterm-convention-public-transportation-dallas-grand-prairie
stevenpiziks: (Default)
We arrived without further incident at the rental place. It was a HUGE, three-bedroom/big kitchen/full living room apartment. My first house was smaller than this place! It was over a three-car garage attached to an even bigger house. It was also in the middle of the woods at the top of the river valley. Thick trees and greenery surrounded the place and we later found a long staircase that wound down the steep side of the valley to the Muskegon River at the bottom where a gazebo nestled among the trees let you gaze across the river and listen to the birds. It was impossibly idyllic and was a great place to unplug and zone out. It felt like we were in the middle of nowhere, but actually the (small) city of Newaygo was less than two miles away, so it had all the advantages of a country getaway and the additional advantages of easy access to city amenities.

We spent the rest of Thursday exploring Newaygo a little. It has a wonderful downtown with a mix of new buildings, original buildings that date back to the 1850s, and re-habbed old buildings. It's been flawlessly kept up, and we suspected there was some civic thing going on to keep the place buffed up and tourist-friendly. (Later we learned this was correct.) We found a funky cafe and had supper. I had chicken stuffed with goat cheese and topped with crisped spinach. It was fantastic! Darwin got ... chicken tenders. (Sigh.) 

At the edge of town is a big cemetery, and we took a quick drive through it. One grave stood out because on it was a statue of a Civil War soldier with mutton-chop sideburns, holding his rifle like a cane. He was striking a heroic pose. Darwin and I both wondered who this guy was and what he'd done to rate such a memorial. I jotted down his name for later research: Samuel Harder. Then we went back to the flat for the night.

Friday was genealogy and history day.

Darwin and I are both history buffs, but we're most interested in the everyday history of everyday people in everyday places. Small towns are especially interesting because they tend not to have big, state- or country-level historical events that overshadow everything else. Also, the buildings are easier to "read." Darwin and I =love= dissecting buildings in small towns. We've become experts at dating when a house or store was built and at spotting the changes that've been made over the decades. It's great fun speculating what might have been the purpose of this bricked-up doorway, or why the staircase that obviously used to be behind that place was removed. We also like imagining what the town was like during the pioneer and Civil War eras. Newaygo was a great place for this kind of thing. 

Our first stop--at my insistence--was the local library, which is right downtown. A bit of poking about turned up a room set aside for works that weren't part of a library's lending collection, including a big shelf of historical documents. They were a real jumble--yearbooks from the 1940s to the present, random newspapers, indices, local government publications, and books on local history written several decades ago, all mixed up together. Historian score!

We had intended to spend only a few minutes in the library but wound up being there for more than two hours. I uncovered some random events of interest while Darwin hunted for mentions of his family: McClary and Freeman. As often happens when we do this, my random samplings turned up references to Darwin's family before he found anything, and I shared them with him. The McClarys and the Freemans weren't especially wealthy or influential in the area. They were blue-collar people who mostly worked in the lumber industry, though a couple were involved in city politics. Darwin was able to confirm a couple of suspicions he had about his family tree, which was nice.

We also turned up information about Samuel Harder, including a trove of letters he'd written. (!) Samuel was an ordinary guy. He worked as a laborer until he joined the Union army and trained as a sharpshooter for the Civil War, though there was no mention of him getting any commendations or medals or saving lives or anything special. He wasn't even an officer. He returned to Newaygo when the war ended, got married, worked as a furniture builder and at other jobs, and had ten children, six of which survived to adulthood. His letters made him out to be a kind, nice man who loved his family greatly, and wasn't shy about saying so. He also teetered at the edge of poverty all his life. One letter lamented that he didn't have enough money to send a package to his son, who lived one town over. He felt helpless and upset when his beloved wife developed chronic ear pain that made her miserable day and night. (I'm guessing she had some kind of recurring infection that modern antibiotics would have cleared up in a day.) She became an invalid and died, still suffering the pain. I felt bad for them both just reading about it.

One thing that was mentioned not at all was who put the war statue of him on his grave and why they did it. Samuel's Civil War record wasn't anything noteworthy. He and his family weren't prominent or wealthy. He wasn't involved in local or state politics. So why the statue? And who paid for it? No clue. My own thinking is that Samuel was simply much-beloved in his family and among the townsfolk, and when he died, they didn't want this nice man to be forgotten, so they clubbed together to put a statue on his grave and keep his memory alive. If that was their intent, it worked--over 150 years later, Darwin and I were learning about him, and now you have, too!

We spent so long at the library that we got hungry for lunch, so we went food hunting. There was a new, tiny sandwich shop and we tried it. The sandwiches were thick and delicious, though it took a while to get them because there was a line and because the shop was a sole-proprietor affair with only two employees: the owner (a woman approaching middle age) and her mother (who volunteered her labor for free). The electronic menu boards sported pictured of food that were clearly AI-generated, and kind of creepy to look at. The owner was probably trying to save money. I think she would have been better off installing chalkboards like other funky sandwich shops do. But the food was good.

Then we headed for the cemeteries. Despite the recent deaths in the family, cemeteries fascinate both of us. We love trying to piece together bits of history based on names and dates carved in stone. Darwin poked around until he found the graves of his great-great-grandparents and of a great-uncle who had died at the age of 18 in a sawmill fire that was probably arson. We also found several graves that I always think are really poignant--the kind that have home-made grave markers on them. One was just a name scrawled in poor handwriting in the cement meant for the gravestone foundation, and it was misspelled, to boot. (We looked it up.) Four graves had wooden crosses with the names carved in them. Several had just the tiny metal plaque with a name on it provided by the graveyard. There's a lot of poverty in rural Michigan, and these graves are evidence of that. A loved one dies, and the family doesn't have the money for a gravestone, so they make do. These graves especially reek of sorrow and desperation to me.

For one of these graves, however, you could see the family decided to go all-out, and fuck the devil! There was no stone, and the marker was one of those wooden crosses with the guy's name carved into it, but the family wasn't going to let a lack of money get in the way of memorializing this guy. On the grave was a pair of work boots with flowers planted in them, two beer bottles, several bouquets of silk flowers, a ring of fieldstones to mark the grave's border, a metal Ford logo, and a bunch of other stuff. To the cross was nailed a grease-stained baseball cap, a few shreds of some work coveralls, and a sculpture made of garage tools welded together. I could imagine someone in the family saying, "Okay, we can't afford a tombstone, so instead, we're all going to go down to the grave tomorrow and decorate it real nice. Everybody bring something!" And they did. So there!

On the way back to the rental flat, we passed what I lovingly refer to as a Michigan redneck bar. These are always one-story, shabby buildings with, at best, a gravel parking area on a country road where you wouldn't expect a bar to be. They look like the kind of place where everyone inside would fall silent and stare at any stranger who comes in, but actually I've always found them to be filled with ordinary people drinking and talking and laughing, and the food is often surprisingly good.

The reason this one caught Darwin's eye was the name: the Freeman Inn. This is one of his family names. "Do you want to stop and look in?" I asked him.

Darwin almost refused, then changed his mind. "Let's do it!"

The place was like all the other redneck Michigan bars I've been in. There were about seven or eight other people who didn't give us a second look. We got a table and intended just to get something to drink and maybe a snack, but then realized we were coming up on suppertime, so why not eat? I had some soft tacos and they were very good. A short conversation with the waitress revealed that the place =used= to be owned by some Freemans, but they sold it to someone else who kept the name for continuity's sake. That was all anyone knew, but it was still fun to learn. We finished dinner at a little after five, and the place was already filling up. Despite its shabby appearance, the Freeman Inn does a brisk business.

Saturday, there was an annual carnival in town: the Newaygo Logging Festival. It featured local craft booths, sidewalk sales, carnival food trucks (you have to get elephant ears and kettle corn--it's the law), historical demonstrations (a blacksmith and some guys in period dress answering questions), and lumberjack games in the park, which consisted of men going at logs and beams with chainsaws to see who could carve them up the fastest. This was a serious competition. They had multiple judges, a timekeeper, and a PA announcer. Though one time they had to halt the contest because a little boy dashed out into the cutting area to pick up a round cut from a log. He examined it, then dropped it, and ran back to his parents again. Everyone found it completely adorable.

I love these kinds of things, incidentally. They're a part of Americana, and they're different in every place that has them. We trolled the craft booths, and I bought some handmade soap. Interestingly, I also came across multiple booths that sold Dungeons and Dragons paraphernalia: dice, coasters shaped like dice, bits of costumery, leather dice-rolling pads, statuettes of D&D-style characters, and so on. Make no mistake--table-top role-playing games have become mainstream. One such booth sported a bunch of fridge magnets with quotes from the Dungeon Crawler Carl books. "You will not break me!" "I don't have thumbs, Carl!" "Mongo is appalled." "Glurp glurp!" And so on. I'm in a D&D group that loves the DCC books, so I took a photo of the display and texted it to everyone. "Anyone want something? Speak up now!" Two of the gamers responded quickly, and I snagged their requests. 




Yesterday we'd seen a little bookstore with the straightforward name of the Newaygo Bookstore, but it had been closed, so today we checked it out. From the outside, the Newaygo Bookstore looks like a small, slightly shabby book shop that's trying to attract customers by doubling as a coffeehouse. But once you get inside, you discover that the place is about four times as big as you thought. The front has a generous selection of new books, and behind those are room after room after room of used books of all sorts. There are also little reading nooks adorned with cozy chairs and cute lamps. It was both a surprise and a delight and we spent considerable time there.

After that, we went back to the flat. I got restless and persuaded Darwin to explore the grounds of the house with me. This was when we found the staircase and the gazebo down by the river. We spent husband togetherness time just letting the river and woods wash tension away. 

Sunday, we slept in, then packed up and drove home through clear weather. No storms! It was a fine weekend.


stevenpiziks: (Default)
Darwin and I were supposed to take a ten-day trip to Pennsylvania in early August that would combine vacation and genealogy research for Darwin. Then my mother died, and then her husband followed, so it was a week of funeral plans and mourning and grief instead. Vacation canceled. 

After things had calmed down a little, I decided to spend a long weekend in Chicago just to get away for a while, but there was a last-minute problem with the lodgings, so I had to cancel it. Vacation canceled again.

I pointed out to Darwin that between him having an unusually busy time at work and the deaths in the family, we hadn't gone anywhere all summer, and there was no reason we couldn't go somewhere at least over Labor Day weekend at least. He agreed.

I asked him if there was anywhere in easy driving distance that he'd been meaning to visit for genealogy, and he pointed to Newaygo. There were at least two graveyards in the area with his family in them that he'd been meaning to visit and document for himself. So we checked around. It's often difficult to find a place to stay in Michigan over a holiday weekend with only a few days' notice, but a very nice one turned up. It was rather bigger than anything we needed, but it was available, so we grabbed it. In order to avoid the horrors of Labor Day weekend traffic (which are big and serious in Michigan; see "tourism" above), we decided to leave on Thursday and return on Sunday. 

On Thursday, we headed west for Newaygo--and drove straight into the biggest storm of the year. We were actually looking for a place to stop for lunch, and we happened across an A&W restaurant, and those are rare these days. Cool! It had an indoor dining room, and we opted to eat there. Just when our food and frosted-mug root beer came, the wind outside whipped up, the sky went black, and it POURED. It was a solid wall of wind and water out there. Clearly, we'd stopped just in time. Driving on the highway in that ... yikes! 

The lights flickered. Uh oh! I tracked down the server and paid the check on the grounds that if the power went out, we wouldn't be able to pay later. Mission accomplished, I sat back down and BINK! The lights went out. They only stayed out for a minute or two, though.

Then phones went off all over the restaurant. Tornado watches everywhere! Tornado warnings for our county back home! Darwin and I kept an eye on the radar map through our phones, hoping our house wouldn't be wiped out, though I pointed out that if anything did happen, it was best that we were far away rather than on-site. I mean, what could we do about it if we were there, right?

We later learned that although tornados did touch down, including in the city of Detroit, our house wasn't damaged. I was very, very glad I had remembered to retract our new awning before we left. It would have been destroyed in that wind.

When the rain eased up, we went on our way.

stevenpiziks: (Default)
 When I was a kid in the 70s and attending SF conventions in the 80s and 90s, hotel check-in times were two o'clock, but you could often get an earlier check-in by asking for it beforehand. Checkout times were 11:00 AM or even noon, and it wasn't usually a problem to get an even later checkout time by just asking the front desk.

Then, in the 00s, things ... shifted. Check-in times became later. Checkout times started earlier. Nowadays, check-in isn't until three or even four o'clock. Checkout is 10 AM, and the front desk doesn't like to extend it--or they'll do it for a fee.

Why the change?

Staffing. If a hotel has three hours (between 11 AM and 2 PM) to turn the rooms over, they need a bunch of housekeepers. Then, someone realized that if they cleared everyone out of the hotel by 10 AM and didn't let new guests in until 4 PM, they'd have twice as much time to turn the rooms over, and could therefore cut the housekeeping staff in half.

So now we're all stuck hanging around the hotel lobby (or finding a place to stash suitcases) until almost suppertime, and then hustling out the hotel door and hunting for breakfast towing a pile of luggage, all so a billion-dollar-a-week hotel chain can save money by firing a pile of people.

But no one seems to have noticed this. Or if they have, they aren't saying anything.

stevenpiziks: (Default)
 I've finally watched the infamous puppet episode of Star Trek: Strange New Worlds.

There will be spoilers.

I enjoyed it, for what it was. The episode was meant to be silly, and it was. It had some hilarious bits and funny one-liners. Carol Kane, as usual, stole every scene she--or her puppet--was in. Rachel Harris was a perfect choice for the sarcastic, exasperated the Orion captain, and I hope we see her character again (though she technically is part of Spock's imagination, so they'd have to come up with a reason for her to really exist). I wasn't really happy with the "it was all just a dream" ending, but if they wanted to do a puppet episode, it was the only way it could be done and still make sense in context. Overall, I give it a thumbs-up.

Meanwhile, certain sections of the internet are screaming the house down over this episode. Completely flipping out. Other sections are racing to the episode's defense. Circling the wagons. The discussion gets heated. Virtual daggers are thrown. But here's the thing both sides are missing:

EVERYONE IS TALKING ABOUT IT.

In 2007, Snickers released a humorous Super Bowl commercial in which two ultra-masculine mechanics accidentally touch lips while munching on the same Snickers. The country went crazy. Some applauded in joy, others fainted in terror. Snickers was castigated. But Snickers.com traffic jumped 1,478% the day after the game, and sales went up by almost 9%. In other words, half the population was horrified by the commercial, but EVERYONE WAS TALKING ABOUT IT. More people were discussing the commercial than the actual game. And Snickers sales went up.

The whole point of any show is to get people to watch it, and you get people to watch it by making sure people are talking about it. Even people who don't usually watch Star Trek are hearing about this episode. The more people howl about it--and defend it--the more people will talk about it and the more people who wouldn't otherwise have known about it, will hear of it. And maybe look it up for themselves.

Also, the howlers and screamers? THEY'VE ALL WATCHED IT. Probably more than once. They do enjoy dissecting shows, and to do that, you have to watch it. Do you think Paramount knows this? Yes. Yes, they do.

The ratings information isn't available yet--I checked--but since it's on streaming, it would really take a couple-three weeks to see if viewership for the episode is higher than, lower than, or the same as the norm. I'm interested in seeing what it's like.
stevenpiziks: (Default)
Ahem:

The Washington (DC) Science Fiction Association (WSFA) pleased to announce the finalists for the 2026 WSFA Small Press Award for Short Fiction:

“Half Life,” by Steven Harper, Skull X Bones, , ed. by David B. Coe and Joshua Palmatier, Zombies Need Brains LLC, (December 2025)*

“Bag of Holding” by Liz Westbrook-Trenholm, On Spec, Vol 35., No. 3, Issue #133, Copper Pig Writers' Society (October 2025), ed. by Diane Walton

“Billionaire’s Tears,” by Vanessa Ricci-Thode, Escape Pod (July 24, 2025), ed. by Mur Lafferty

“Blackrock,” by R. M. Olson, Skull X Bones, ed. by David B. Coe and Joshua Palmatier; Zombies Need Brains LLC, (December 2025)

“Guardians of the Well,” by Rose Strickman, In Another Time Magazine, Issue 3, (June 2025), ed. by Agatha Grimke

“The Last Mardi Gras,” by Raven Jakubowski, DreamForge Anvil #20, DreamForge Press, LLC (June 1, 2025), ed. by Scot Noel

“Not a Fish,” by Andrew Dykstal, Beneath Ceaseless Skies #434 (June 12, 2025), ed. by Scott H. Andrews

“The Teleporting Disaster Fairy,” by Rati Mehrotra, Uncanny Magazine, Issue 67 (November/December 2025), ed. by Michael Damian Thomas.

The award honors the efforts of small press publishers in providing a critical venue for short fiction in the area of speculative fiction, and showcases the best original short fiction published by small presses in the previous year (2025). An unusual feature of the selection process is that the voting is done with the identity of the author and publisher hidden so that the final choice is based solely on the quality of the story.

The winner is chosen by members of the Washington Science Fiction Association (www.wsfa.org), and the award will be presented at their annual convention, Capclave (www.capclave.org), held this year on October 2-4, at the Rockville Hilton & Executive Meeting Center, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD.

Cathy Green
for WSFA Small Press Award Committee
Award Sponsored by the Washington Science Fiction Association and Capclave – Where Reading is not Extinct

*I changed the order of the nominees from the original press release to put my story first so it would be more obvious why I was posting. :) The Skull X Bones anthology is available at https://www.amazon.com/Skull-X-Bones-Alan-Smale/dp/1940709865 .

Congratulations to all the nominees! See you at CapClave!
 

Gene Beitz

Aug. 17th, 2026 12:32 pm
stevenpiziks: (Default)
My mother's husband Gene Beitz passed away in hospice this morning.

I wasn't very close to Gene, but I did like him, and considered him part of the family. He was a steady presence in my mother's life. He was born, grew up, lived, and died on the farm that's been in his family for over 100 years. He met my mother online and a while later, they got married. This was the first of three October weddings in three years in our family.

Everyone, including Gene himself, expected him to pass away long before my mother did. He survived her by nine days. It's been a lot for our family to handle this week. 
stevenpiziks: (Default)
 This came up in a friend's group, and I thought I'd repost my observations here.
 
TL/DR: Women are becoming more wary of long-term relationships with men because they're tired of being an emotional dumping ground for stuff you usually talk about with your best friends, and these days, men rarely have best guy friends they can talk to.   
 
So why don't men have best friends much these days?
 
This is just my observation, and I have no data to back it up, but I think it's because men (and boys) tend to be activity-driven when they socialize. Men feel like they need something to do together--fishing, video games, the gym, drinking, etc. Psychologists will tell you, for example, that if you want to talk to your son about something serious, do it while you're doing something together. I told my sons I was gay while we were doing dishes, for example. 
 
When guys are young, it's easy for them to find similar interests. "You like playing on the slide, and =I= like playing on the slide! We're friends now!" As guys grow up and age, though, interests diverge. Your best friend develops an interest in fantasy football while you develop an interest in hiking the Appalachian Trail. You spend less time together and become less of a release valve for each other because you don't have much to =do= together while you talk.
 
Women, on the other hand, are more willing to visit and talk, without an activity. (Yes, women will meet over an activity--book club, knitting, drinking--but they're MORE WILLING to get together just to visit than men.) It's therefore easier for women to maintain friendships. 
 
I've seen this in my own life. I socialize with two sets of males. The first one is (was) a poker group. I was invited to join through work, and I was a total stranger at my first game. But there were no awkward "get to know you" conversations with long pauses because we were playing cards and could rely on the game to get through any awkward moments. We played monthly for years and all became pretty good friends. One of the guys called me to ask for advice when his son came out, in fact. But eventually, interest in the game waned. When there weren't enough guys to get a game together, the whole thing evaporated. We never once got together just to hang out. It wouldn't have occurred to anyone to ask.
 
My second group is my two male cousins. We were very close when we were growing up, but as adults, distance and changes in interests let us drift apart, and we only saw each other at holidays, and sometimes not even then. A year ago, though, I learned one of my cousins hosts a D&D role-playing group that meets every month, and my other cousin—his brother—is playing, too. The game, though, is over two hours away by car for me. Still, I asked to join, and I quickly became a standing group member. I've become pretty good friends with the other two guys as well, and I re-forged my boyhood relationship with my cousins, which is why I did this. Would I drive two hours there and back just to hang out with my cousins and two other guys, say, for a monthly barbecue? No. The activity provides a focus that binds us. Without it, we wouldn't come together.
 
So I think a big part of the problem is that men need a common activity to bind their friendships together, and women don't.
 
stevenpiziks: (Default)
 On August 8, my mother Penny Beitz (born Margaret Drake) passed away at home in her sleep.
Mom was a nurse for 40 years before a heart problem forced her to retire. After that, she travelled all around the country and all around the world. The Caribbean, France, England, Ukraine. She loved exploring new places and meeting new people.
She was a wonderful mom who always did her best to be kind to everyone. She readily accepted Darwin into the family after I told her I was gay. She left a hole in my life, and it's hard to write this because I keep tearing up.
 
I wrote this to my mother last November for what turned out to be her last birthday. I found it among her things.
Dear Mom,
Happy birthday! I wanted to write you a letter for it, so that's what I'm doing. I was thinking of how to put you into words, distill you into letters on a page. And it's both simple and impossible.
You're Mom.
What's that mean? It means doing crafts together. Cool hands during a fever. Sleeping with the fan on. Beach trips. State park camping. Pancakes. A second layer of bacon under the paper towel. Mailing letters to Santa. Keeping the cat that caught rats. Eating lunch using the kitchen shelf as a table while painting the new farmhouse. Spring cleaning with the windows open to fresh, chilly air. Ice cream in a lunch thermos. Going to piano lessons and the library. Driving miles and miles for trick-or-treat. Letters from home to Germany. Visiting baby Aran for the first time. Greeting Sasha and Maksim at the airport with welcome signs. Welcoming a new son-in-law instead of daughter-in-law.
It's everything I remember about you and how glad I am that I'm your son. Happy birthday!
Love,
Steven
stevenpiziks: (Default)
As part of my continuing canning campaign, I canned tomatoes.

As I did with the blueberries and strawberries, I didn't pick them myself. I bought them from a farm stand. $50 for a bushel. As a bonus, I'd visited my mother recently, and she had a whole bunch of jars, screw lids, and unused inner lids in the basement that she said she'd never use again, so I happily harvested those. It brought the cost down considerably!

I had already learned a lot from working with berries, so I was primed and ready! Tomatoes are more complicated to can, though, and I had to work out a system. Tomatoes need to be scored, blanched, cooled, peeled, quartered, cooked, jarred, and finally processed for 40 minutes in boiling water--many, many steps--and you can't really send all the tomatoes through each steps at once, unless you have a trio of car-sized cauldrons!

First, I set the big processing cauldron on to heat, since I knew from experience it would take a long time to come to a boil. I'd also scored from my mother a blanching pot with two matching colanders, which made things go faster--I scored enough tomatoes to fill one colander, dropped it into the boiling blanching pot, then scored enough tomatoes to fill the second colander. This kept things moving. I removed the first set of tomatoes from the blancher (and discovered if you do it really fast, the water doesn't drain back into the pot quickly enough and will spill over onto the stove powerfully enough to extinguish the gas burner), dumped them into ice water, and dropped the second colander into the blancher. 

I peeled the blanched tomatoes, and that was as fun as I'd remembered from helping my mother when I was a kid. You squeeze the tomato, and if you do it right, it pops right out of its skin! The proper sound effect for this is "squip!" When they were partly done, the second colander was finished, so I dumped those into ice water and finished peeling the first set. The second set was cool by then, so I peeled them, too. Next, I cut the stems out, quartered the fruit, and put it all into a big stewpot. This went onto the stove until it came to a boil, which would take a while, so I went back to step one: scoring another set of tomatoes for blanching. Repeat, repeat, repeat.

Once the stove tomatoes had boiled and stewed for five minutes, I ladled them into jars I'd already prepped in the dishwasher. Although my mother had put tomatoes into quart jars, she was feeding a family of five and needed a bunch all at once. I've just got two people here, so I went for pint jars. Used my wand to lift inner lids out of simmering water (I was using four out of five burners now) and popped those on, followed with the screw tops. The full set went into the wire basket, which in turn went into the huge processing pot of boiling water. There they bubbled for 40 minutes, which gave me time to start work on the next set.

It was busy, busy work that occasionally got a little frantic. There were times when it was time to remove a set of tomatoes from the blanching pot at the same time the stewpot finished boiling and I was in the middle of peeling yet another set. It took some time and kitchen management skill to get through it.

After several hours, the last batch of jars was boiling in the processing pot and I was down to the 10 pounds of fresh tomatoes I'd set aside for making marinara sauce. I'd rather have my own marinara for spaghetti, but I don't always have the energy or patience to make it on a given day, so preserving a bunch of it seemed an ideal solution.

My mother never made marinara sauce at home, but I have my own recipe for it, and I'd decided to try using my Instant Pot to speed it up. I blanched and peeled everything (I don't like peels in my marinara), then smooshed the tomatoes by hand to crush them. I sautéed onions and garlic in the bottom of the Instant Pot and poured in the crushed tomatoes. They just filled! Added salt, pepper, oregano, and parsley and set the pot to pressurize. 

Meanwhile, the final set of jars had another half hour to boil. I was able to take a break!

One sit-down later, the last jars were done and the marinara sauce was ready. I set the jars on the counter, but kept the processing water hot, since I'd need it for later.

The Instant Pot had cooked the sauce well, but by the time it got up to pressure (20 minutes) and cooked the tomatoes (also 20 minutes) and I depressurized it (5 minutes), I could have just stewed them myself just as well. A note for next time.

I used a blending wand to puree the tomatoes into sauce, then tried putting the Instant Pot on sauté to simmer it, but the Instant Pot didn't like that, and anyway, the shape of the pot meant it would take a long, long time for the sauce to cook down, so I divided the sauce between my two biggest wide-bottom pans and left it to simmer for an hour. That worked, and I got the consistency I wanted. It also gave me time to clean the kitchen--canning gets water and tomato detritus =everywhere.= And so, so many big containers to wash! 

I jarred the sauce and got only five and a half pints. Marinara really cooks down. Next year, I'll probably double this. The jars went into the processor, and I finished cleaning up.

When it was all over, a bushel of tomatoes had produced 35 and a half pints of preserved tomatoes and 5 and a half pints of marinara. Only one jar--tomatoes--didn't seal properly and had to go into the fridge along with the half-jars. 

By now it was after 8:00. I'd been at it for more than eleven hours, and I also forgot to eat lunch! I ordered pizza and bread sticks so we could dip the bread sticks in my marinara, and it was absolutely delicious.

Next up: peaches!

stevenpiziks: (Default)
When I was teaching, summer break went through three phases:

1. June: Woo hoo! Summer break just started!
2. Mid-July: Oh, man. Halfway over! Gotta get out there and enjoy summer break more!
3. August: How can I only have two weeks left already? Don't make me go back. I'm begging you.

The back-to-school stress always started in August when we got the "Welcome Back!" email from administration. I also had to schedule my two "make-up in advance" work days in order to get two religious holidays off during the regular school year, and I did them in early August to get them out of the way. Going into the school building in early August always signaled that break was almost over and created a continual stream of low-level anticipatory stress for the rest of break. It was like knowing you had painful surgery coming up.

But I'm retired now. There's no "Wecome Back!" email for me, no extra workdays, nothing. I still feel like I should be stressed, and sometimes I am. I get these "oh crap" twinges out of nowhere, and it takes me a moment to identify them as back-to-school PTSD. But I'm NOT GOING BACK. That realization makes the stress vanish so fast, I feel like I'm going to float away. It's the best feeling ever.

I loved teaching. I was good at it. Great, really. But in the last ten or fifteen years, the job changed. It got more difficult than it was ever meant to be, with changes in curriculum and all-powerful standardized testing and lower wages and reduced benefits and ever-increasing class sizes. Then the pandemic came along and teachers were vilified because we didn't want to endanger our own lives and teach unmasked students face-to-face, and then we were vilified even more because student test scores dropped during a world-wide disaster, and it was somehow our fault that students didn't learn as well.

Then certain members of the school board and parent community went gunning for me because I'm gay, and I had to defend myself against a fire hose of bigoted conflicts and frivolous legal fights and mean-spirited defamation campaigns that came from a dozen directions all at once. I won every single fight, but it was still off-the-charts stressful. It was also difficult being angry all the time. My job lost its joy and August became a month of dread.

I carried that burden of stress and dread for so long, it became a part of me. I just accepted it as part of the my world, like a fish accepts polluted water.

Now it's August and I don't have to go back to work. It makes me giddy sometimes. A crushing weight is gone and I can fly. It's marvelous and thrilling. I'm loving it.
stevenpiziks: (Default)
 Michigan's primary election for Governor and Senator was held yesterday.
In Michigan, you can only vote for ONE party in the primary. You can't vote on the Democratic race for Governor, say, and the GOP candidate for Senator.
For governor, 929, 879 total votes were cast in the GOP race. In the Democratic race, it was 1,494,323. In other words, more than half a million more Democrats turned out to vote than GOP voters. If this had been the actual election, the GOP candidate would have resoundingly lost.
If this holds true during the upcoming mid-terms, the GOP is in deep, deep trouble.
stevenpiziks: (Default)
In books, movies, and TV shows, we have this common trope:

The protagonist, faced with overwhelming odds, gets an idea. It's something unusual that couldn't possibly work and his friends try to dissuade him. "It's doomed to failure," they plead. "You can't do X!" The protagonist then doubles down and says, "Not true! We're going to do X. In fact, we're going to do X three times as hard as I originally said." Reluctantly, everyone says, "Well, we've got no other solutions, and this is so crazy, it just might work." And to everyone's shock, it does work! We win! Roll credits.

An example of this is David and Goliath. (Stick with me--this is going somewhere.) The Philistines have an overwhelming force, so to save time, they allow the giant Goliath to challenge one Israelite to single combat, winner take all. The Israelites don't like the idea--no one could defeat such a huge warrior--but David, a young boy, says, "No! We're going to accept the terms. And the warrior we send will be ME." "Whaaaaa?" says the tribe. "That'll never work." "It will!" says David. Then he doubles down with, "And also I'm not going to wear armor or carry a sword." "Well," says the tribe, "no one could win, so we may as well let a little kid get killed rather than lose an adult warrior." So David faces Goliath, looses a stone from his sling, and to everyone's shock, kills Goliath with a single blow to the head. We win!

This makes for a good story, but it's rotten in reality. In the real world, the impossible solution is just that--impossible. No amount of crazy planning will pull off the impossible.

Donald Trump, however, lives in TV land.

I think he's spent so much time in Hollywood that he honestly believes this trope will work in real life. The wilder and more improbable the plan is, the more likely it'll succeed. Look at how he operates:

--He wanted to build a wall across the entire US border with Mexico. He was told there just isn't enough money for that. No one would pay for it. "No!" he said craftily. "Mexico itself will pay for the wall!" "Impossible!" everyone replied. "It'll never work!" "In fact," Trump said, doubling down, "I'll DEMAND that Mexico pays for the wall!" 

--He wanted to take over the entire country with ICE as his personal army. "We're going to take the country with my troops," he said. "We can't do that," said his aides. "We don't have the manpower for it. America is huge, you know." "No!" he replied, doubling down. "We're going to FLOOD the country with ICE agents and everyone will be cowed into doing anything I say!" 

--He wanted to steal the election. "I'll make the country keep me as president." "It can't be done, sir. You lost, and that's all there is to it," they said. He said, "I'll whip up my followers." "It won't work, sir." So he doubled down: "In fact, I'll whip them up so much that they'll riot and take the entire country for me! I won't have to lift a finger!"

--He wanted to take over Iran. "Sir, we don't have the military firepower right now. We're spread too thin. And gas prices will skyrocket, and everyone hates that." "Oh yeah? Well, we're going to bomb the hell out of Iran and give it all we have in one shot that'll obliterate the government." "Sir, there's just no way that'll happen. We can't do it." "Oh YEAH?" he repeated, doubling down. "Watch---we're going to hit them really, really hard and then ... then the Iranians themselves will rise up and finish the job."

--He wanted to steal billions from the country. "I'll sue for it," he said. "You can't sue over nothing, sir." "Yeah? Watch this--I'll sue for defamation!" "Sir, you haven't been defamed." "AND," he said, "I'll sue the IRS, which I'm the head of anyway. I'll sue ... MYSELF!"

To all of these, add, "It's so crazy, it just might work."

None of these, or a dozens of other double-down schemes, worked, but he keeps trying them, like a screenwriter who can't think of a new ending. He goes with the crazy plan because it always works in the movies, and I think he's shocked when it turns out that movie plans don't work in real life. He yells at his aides. He breaks dishes. He throws ketchup. 

And then he tries another stupid plan. Because he's so crazy, it just might work.
 

stevenpiziks: (Default)
 Speaking of advice columns, Miss Manners today addressed one of my pet peeves:

DEAR MISS MANNERS: Referring to "guys" has become a constant refrain during newscasts: "Now over to you guys" for every opening, and "Back to you guys" for every conclusion. Restaurant servers greet customers with "How are you guys?" and "How are you guys doing?" and end with, "You guys have a nice night" -- regardless of the gender of the diners.

Is anyone else bothered by this? Once you start noticing it, it can drive you crazy.

GENTLE READER: Indeed. And the widespread use of "guys" to address women is particularly mystifying after the fraught learning process of changing job titles from masculine to neutral -- "fireman" to "firefighter," "stewardess" to "flight attendant," and such.

Miss Manners is just grateful she is not the language police.

(Me again):

People used to claim that "he" and "man" and "mankind" were gender-neutral when used to refer to the general population. They never actually were. It was blatant sexism from the get-go, and nowadays we've mostly managed to eradicate this insidious little custom--except when it comes to "guys."

When did "guys" become the standard group word? It's not gender-neutral any more than "man" is, but you hear it everywhere. I've even heard women address a group of women as "guys."

When I complain about this or call people on it, and they say, "Guys is gender-neutral," I respond with, "Ask some of your straight male friends how many GUYS they've slept with, and you'll soon see how gender-specific that word is."

What to use instead? "Folks." "Everyone." "Everybody." "People." "Group." "Class" (if you're a teacher). "Guys and gals" is ... iffy. You may have non-binary people in the group to whom neither term applies.

Avoiding "guys" in a mixed group is often a habit, but it CAN be broken. Can you do it?

stevenpiziks: (Default)
 Jeanne Phillips ("Dear Abby") is retiring. The column will continue with an "editorial team" answering the letters. Jeanne took over the column from her mother Pauline Phillips.
This is the last of the Big Three advice columns to lose their central figures. Ann Landers ended completely when Eppie Lederer died. Judith Martin (Miss Manners) handed the column down to her son and daughter, though her name still appears on it. Now the second woman behind Dear Abby has left.
It's inevitable that columnists age and retire. Can't be helped. The syndicate, of course, wants the column to continue--no one wants a cash cow to die--so they look for ways to prop the animal up, such has handing the work off onto someone else. Advice columns do have a long-standing tradition of being written by a semi-anonymous person behind a figurehead, so it's theoretically easy to find another writer to take over the name.
Originally, advice columns WERE completely anonymous--and local! "Dear Auntie Jo" appeared only in your hometown newspaper, and you had the fun of trying to figure out both who the columnist was and who among your neighbors had written the letter confessing to an affair with the milkman. Eventually, the Big Three edged out all the smaller ones, and the women who wrote them became celebrities in their own right--you didn't have to stay anonymous when your problem letters come from all over the world instead of your friends and neighbors.
I read these advice columns in printed newspapers and still read them online every day. They're interesting snippets of other people's lives. Some of them make you say, "Thank heavens that's not me!" or "Who could possibly do something like that?" or "Why would you be so foolish?" or "Awwwww!" It's always fun to read the letters aloud Darwin else and see if his advice matches the columnist's.
My first exposure to gay acceptance came through Ann Landers, who regularly told her readers that there was nothing wrong with LGBT people. Go her! Ann Landers was also the first columnist to address "private" issues like STIs, assault, and domestic abuse in ways that didn't blame the victim. She had to fight the syndicate and the newspapers more than once over it. By bringing underground issues into mainstream newspapers, she and other columnists got society to acknowledge these issues exist and do something about them.
There are other advice columnists, but none of them have the reach or punch of the Big Three. The art form is fading, I think, thanks to the internet. Why write to a national advice columnist on the one-in-a-million chance you might get an answer two months later when you can ask on Reddit and get a hundred answers in ten minutes?
I'll keep reading the editorial staff version of Dear Abby, I suppose, but I'll miss the original.
stevenpiziks: (Default)
I've been teaching myself to can. My mother used to can a lot, and I both watched and helped with prepping ingredients (peeling blanched tomatoes, cleaning strawberries, sorting blueberries, etc.), but I never did the actual canning part. So I had to learn. Fortunately, canning isn't actually difficult, just time-consuming. 

I'm cheating in one important way, though--I'm not picking anything myself. I can't count how many days my siblings and I spent picking strawberries, blueberries, tomatoes, apples, and more. Strawberries weren't too bad--you can sit down, the berries fill up a container quickly, and it's kind of fun to lift the plant leaves and look for little red treasures. Tomatoes were the most physically difficult because they're heavy, and a basketful of them is a hard lift. Blueberries were the worst. The season comes during the hottest, buggiest part of summer and it takes a LOT of blueberries to fill a pail. My brother, sister, and I agreed that dropping the first blueberry into an empty pail, where it rolled around the bottom and illustrated just how much room was left to fill, was discouraging. You knew you were going to be there for a while.

I didn't want to go through that again, especially because the boys are grown and gone, and Darwin has flatly refused to pick anything, so it would just be me out there. It would take a lot of work to pick berries on my own. I also looked up prices and discovered pre-picked berries aren't much more expensive than U-pick berries. U-pick blueberries, for example, cost about $3 a pound. Pre-picked blueberries cost $25 for a five-pound box, or $5 a pound. And they're already washed and sorted. That means twenty pounds of pre-picked berries cost only $25 more than u-pick, and it would take me HOURS in the hot sun to pick 20 pounds myself, AND I'd still have to wash and sort them. Is it worth it to pay $25 more for someone else to pick and sort for me? Yes. Yes, it is.

This was NOT the case when I was a kid. U-pick was way cheaper than buying at the market. I suspect the price has effectively come down because machines have taken over a chunk of the labor and modern farming techniques have increased harvests, making everything that much cheaper.

So I bought pre-picked berries. 

The internet is a wonderful tool for teaching yourself a new skill. It right handily showed me how do the stuff I didn't do as a kid. Canning hasn't changed that much. You still use that big, dark blue canning pot, the matching jar rack, and the canning funnel. The jars and lids are exactly the same. The only things I don't remember from childhood are a jar lifter (a tong-like device that let's you pick up a blistering hot jar without burning yourself) and a magnetized wand that lets you lift inner lids from simmering water. 

I canned a whole pile of strawberries into jam in June and found I was a dab hand at it. Yesterday I canned 20 pounds of blueberries into jam. The steps were the same as they were forty years ago: mash the fruit, cook it down until it boils, add lemon juice and pectin, boil some more, add a hella lot of sugar, boil one more time, ladle into jars, put on lids, boil jars in huge pot for 10 minutes, remove, let cool, listen for the little POP as each jar seals. The part I was ignorant of was the boiling of the fruit and of the jars. I had never done that. But it isn't difficult, and I pulled it off handily. The weather also cooperated. Canning makes for a hot, steamy kitchen, usually a misery in July, but it was only in the mid-70s that day. A couple window fans kept things comfortable. Perfect! 

Next up, I'm planning to do peaches, though I'm going to freeze those rather than can them. It'll be easier, and the peaches come out better anyway. In a few weeks, I'll try tomatoes, and maybe marinara sauce.

Now I have a LOT of strawberry and blueberry jam. Guess what everyone's getting for Christmas this year?
stevenpiziks: (Default)
 They say couples fight about money more than anything else. A prime example: https://www.pressreader.com/foryou...
TL/DR: In a household with one-pot finances, a wife got a second job to pay for her new, expensive hobby, then became upset when her husband spent what was left of that "extra" income on himself because he needed something to do to fill the void when she was gone all the time. The columnist said she and her husband need to communicate better about money.
My response? Drop it, dearie. You've gotten a second job to pay for your expensive sport that leaves your husband, who misses you, alone a lot. So he spends some extra money for himself. Why shouldn't he? If all your money goes into "one pot," then you can't designate money you earned vs. money he earned, or separate how it's spent. If your jobs bring in $3,000 and $500, and his job brings in $3,000, you both have $6,500. If you spend $400 on your sport, and you can say, "Well, that comes out of the 'extra' money from my second job," then he can certainly spend another $200 on entertainment for himself when you're gone and say, "Well, that comes out of my salary." Your husband misses you when you go off on your expensive, time-consuming sport AND when you go to your time-consuming second job to pay for it. All that time comes out of couples time for the two of you. If it bothers you that he wants something to do while you indulge yourself, think of it this way: part of the expense of your sport is helping your husband fill the gap he's missing from your absence.

Profile

stevenpiziks: (Default)
stevenpiziks

September 2026

S M T W T F S
  1234 5
6 78 910 1112
13141516171819
2021 2223242526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 24th, 2026 01:47 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios