stevenpiziks: (Default)
One of the bigger problems writers face these days is the cell phone. Authors spend a LOT of time separating their characters from their phones in order to explain why a character in trouble doesn't just whip out a device and call for help. A protagonist's cell phone gets broken, lost, stolen, or depowered with alarming regularity, and large swaths of fictional worlds inconveniently have no bars.
 
And then there's this trope:
 
The bad guys are coming. They've broken into the house. Jenny has to hide, fast. She dives into a clever hiding spot. She can't call for help because the villains will hear her. The bad guys spread through the house, guns aiming with sinister intent. One of them passes close to Jenny. She holds her breath, frightened, but pretty sure he won't find her. Then ... Mom calls. Bzzzt bzzzt! Frantically, Jenny fumbles with her phone and ends the call, but it's too late. The bad guy heard the faint buzzing. He yanks open her hiding place and Jenny is captured. (In an alternative version, Jenny accidentally connects the call instead of hanging up, and Mom says in a loud, annoying voice, "Jenny? Why haven't you returned my calls? The florist is up in arms about the buttercups!" And the bad guy grabs her.)
 
I mean, EVERY TIME. 
 
It's gotten to the point where I expect it. Just today, I was watching a spy show, and the hapless Jenny character hid behind some boxes in the basement while the bad guys prowled around. I said, "Oh! Someone's going to call her and give her away." Two seconds later: Bzzzt bzzzt! And she was captured.
 
Look, Hollywood, I know it's not easy to come up with new ways to get your characters into trouble, but when the audience spots it coming, you've created a cliche. Give this one up.
 
stevenpiziks: (Default)
(Unpopular opinion coming up.)

Andor is a slooooooowwww show. My god, it's slow. Did I mention that it's slow? We should talk about how slow the show is, just like the show endlessly talks about stuff that is slow, in a slow, slow way.


The show also has no fun or funny robots (B2EMO is barely a presence). It has no light saber battles. It has no space ship battles. It has no central antagonist that we love to hate.

So what =does= it have?

A dry study of the economics of the Empire. Speeches at the Empire Senate. Dinner parties. Shopping trips to an expensive boutique. Long, long, LONG discussions about the nature of morality. Long, long, LONG discussions about whether or not to go through with a plan (when we already know full well they're going to go through with the plan). Long, long, LONG examinations of family dynamics in families that aren't all that interesting. And a slow, slow plot. In other words, it has nothing fans expect in a Star Wars show.

I haven't fully understood the high praise the show gets. It's a decent soap opera in a SNnal setting, but everything moves so slowly that I haven't felt compelled to scarf down the next episode. And I can forgive a slow plot if the characters are compelling, but ... they just aren't. I watch the show more out of a sense of duty and a desire to keep up with SW continuity than anything else, but I can only work up enough interest to watch an episode every couple of weeks. Viewers like me are the reason the show's numbers are down.

https://screenrant.com/andor-star-wars-show-fans-not-watching-reason/
stevenpiziks: (Default)
 TOM SWIFT is the first CW adventure show featuring a Black gay man as the lead character. We all had high hopes for it. Now the CW has announced its cancellation.

Why? The ratings were, frankly, shitty. No one was watching. Was it because of the gay Black lead?

No.

The show was awful. It really was. I could see what they were trying to do, but it was all done ... badly. Tom himself simply wasn't very engaging. I didn't really much care about his personal struggles. The networked hyped that he was gay, and they did make it very clear that Tom was gay, but his relationship with his sort-of boyfriend ... failed. There was no chemistry between them. Meanwhile, Tom does show serious chemistry with his bodyguard Isaac, but Isaac also has a thing for one of the women on the show. It looks like the studio wanted both a love triangle AND a "will they/won't they?" couple. What they got was a half-hearted, uninteresting tangle.

I also looks like the studio thought Tom's thing for cars and shoes would make him a cool-guy icon, but that didn't work, either. Yeah, there are the sneaker-heads, but most male viewers don't care what kind of shoe the character wears, even if it has some kind of tech embedded in it, and most female viewers don't care about men's shoes. And the cars such obvious product placement, it was painful. Also, the guy who gets to choose which multi-million dollar car he drives from an entire garage of them automatically becomes less relatable. I didn't envy Tom for his cars, nor did I wish to be him. I only felt he was spoiled.

The overall stakes are too low, or perhaps too abstract. In the first episode, Tom's father boards a Saturn-bound ship that Tom himself built, but the ship explodes after it reaches Saturn. At first, Tom--and everyone else--thinks Dad is dead, but Tom learns his dad is still alive and that a global conspiracy (sigh) sabotaged the ship. Tom now has to rush around the country trying to gather what he needs to rescue his stranded father. The trouble here is that, once the ship explodes, we don't see Dad. We don't feel that he's in danger. And he isn't. The show makes it clear that Dad has plenty of oxygen and whatever else he needs to survive until rescue comes, and in the series, Tom goes off on long, non-Dad tangents, and doesn't seem to be all that concerned that his dad is stranded in space. We have a "we'll get around to it" feeling here. Additionally, Tom doesn't like Dad very much, and for good reason. Dad is cold, homphobic, and plain ol' bitchy to Tom, who would frankly be better off without him. The viewer is left wondering why Tom is so bent on rescuing him at all.

The world-building was also lacking. The show is set in modern-day America, but Tom somehow has access to Star Trek technology--a faster-than-light drive, nanobots, easy retroviruses, and of course, an omniscient AI that malfunctions whenever the plot requires it. Tom's inventions show up lightning-quick, too. In one episode, Tom is able to whip up a miracle drug from some tree sap in just a few minutes. Star Trek can get away with it because of the far-future setting. Tony Stark in the Marvel movies can get away with it because of the super-hero setting. But for this show, the viewer is forced to wonder why all this fantastic tech hasn't made its way into the mainstream.

We also have no decent antagonists. The antagonist is a nebulous conspiracy called The Road Back. The heavy hitters in the organization are, frankly, bland. The group's aims are vague, but they seem to want to roll technology back to prevent ecological disaster. How is this a bad thing? Their members also act with astounding stupidity, which Tom himself fails to take advantage of. In one late-season episode, Tom is talking one-on-one with a tiny, Hollywood-thin woman who is a heavy-hitter in Road Back. She possesses a bit of tech Tom needs to rescue Dad, and she snottily refuses to tell him where it is. I watched this, thinking, "When is he going to grab her and force her to talk? When is he going to conk her over the head and tie her up in the basement until she talks? She's a third his size, has no bodyguards, no weapons, nothing, and she's making threats. Come on, Tom! Get her!" But she simply walks out of the room, leaving Tom shrugging helplessly.

Bad world-building, unsympathetic characters, no romance. It all equals a bad show.

 




stevenpiziks: (Default)
So I finally had a look at REACHER.

Huh.

The show is based on Lee Child's books. The premise is that Jack Reacher is an overwhelmingly tall, hugely strong guy who enjoys a good fist fight. He wanders the country as a nomad--literally walking, since he doesn't own a car--and whenever he arrives in a new town, some kind of Awful Event happens, and Reacher is pulled into solving it.

The show is total white male wank fantasy. Reacher is tall, impossibly well built, freakishly strong, defends his woman, maintains his massive build by eating nothing but junk food, never, ever works out, always knows what to do, fucks like a snorting bull, notices everything, misses nothing, remains stoic even in the face of family tragedy (except for one scene where a single, manly tear trickles down his chiseled cheek), owns nothing but somehow manages to get his hands on cool cars and big guns whenever he needs them, and can take multiple hits with a crowbar without breaking a bone or even getting bruised. And he has a black sidekick, so he can say he isn't racist.

He's what every good old boy thinks they are, knows they aren't, and secretly longs to be.

One of the more interesting things (for me) to watch is the camera work. Alan Ritchie, who plays Reacher, is several inches shorter than the character is. So they compensate with camera tricks--having Reacher in the foreground, while other characters are in the background, putting Ritchie on a box so he can tower over someone in a close-up, using overhead shots that disguise everyone's height, and so on. They get quite clever about it, but once you notice it, you can't stop.

Having said all that, I found the show fun to watch, especially since Reacher keeps taking his clothes off. You won't find ground-breaking anything here. It's an occasionally gory action-thriller with a few sex scenes thrown in, but for what it is, it's a good show.



stevenpiziks: (Default)
I finally--FINALLY--watched my way through the first season of STARGIRL.

I have issues.

Okay, so the show is more light-hearted than its predecessors (most notably TITANS), which I like.  But . . .

--The show is built around denial.  Check this, please: Courtney wants to be a super-hero. The star staff (we'll get there in a minute) has chosen her, and no one else.  We have a set of super-villains killing in and destroying the city, and no one seems able to stop them.  We NEED Courtney out there.  But her step-father Mike (a whiny simp who, it must be said, has no balls) spends all his time stopping her.  In every. Single. EPISODE, Mike tells Courtney some version of, "This is too dangerous. You can't do this. No. Stop."  When Courtney tries to re-form the Justice Society, Mike tries to stop her.  When she tries to learn more about her powers and her history, Mike tries to stop her.  It makes sense, initially--Courtney's young, and Mike has seen death in super-hero battles. He doesn't want Courtney to get hurt.  But after a while, the denial becomes annoying, even outrageous.  If Courtney doesn't become a hero, the show will end, so let her do her job, please.  You protest too much.  Later, when Mike wants to tell Courtney's mother what's really going on, Courtney stops him, or other events stop him.  Again--makes sense at first,  becomes stupid writing later.  When the teenaged Justice Society FINALLY gets together to train and learn how to use their gadgetry (and I was thinking, "Yay! We can see some super-hero cutting loose"), Mike sets up ridiculous combat dummies made of paper plates with childish drawings of their enemies on them. When Courtney cuts through them in half a second (as she should), Mike gets mad and storms off in a childish pique. No training.  Denied again.  This goes on and on and on through the season.  The way it's presented makes me thing, "This isn't a theme. It's the writers being unable to think of anything else to do."

--The 1950s nostalgia.  My gods, folks.  I know the show is based on characters from a 1950s comic book, but when you make the entire town--every house, every car, every shop, every bit of music--look like we've stepped back to the 50s, we feel hit over the head.  It's overwrought and overdone.  Please stop it.

--The gadgets.  This is a big problem on the show.  All our teenaged protagonists but one get their powers from a gadget.  Stargirl has a staff that can do anything the writers want it to do. Dr. Mid-Nite, the most useless of all the characters, talks to an AI that conveniently tells her anything the plot needs her to know.  Hourman gets his strength from a talisman.  Wildcat gets hers from a costume.  Even Mike, the no-nut wonder, gets his powers from an Iron Man style suit.  All these characters get their powers from an outside source.  None of them get their power from within.  The only exception is Brainwave Junior.  And he dies.  The trouble here is that the characters are dependent on their gadgets. Without them, they're ordinary kids (except maybe Wildcat, who can box a little).  This also means their powers can do literally anything.  The staff shows new powers, or shuts down unexpectedly, on a writerly whim.  Wildcat's costume sprouts claws and unexpectedly gives her fantastic gymnastic powers.  Dr. Mid-Nite's AI, of course, is the standard Hollywood magic computer that can tell you anything at any time, and "hack" any computer system.  It's comical (in a bad way) to watch the characters strain and cry out with effort when it's clear that they aren't actually straining.  Mike's suit does all the lifting, for example, so why is he grunting and groaning?  Courtney's staff zaps bad guys with a power blast (a power that everyone seems to forget about when having it would make the fight end too quickly), but she screams through gritted teeth.  Why?  All she's basically doing is firing a machine a gun. The gadgets take away the characters' power to dig deep, to expand their strength and learn something about themselves in the process.  In-born powers give a character a chance to overcome limitations with willpower and heart. That's what a super-hero show is about.  A gadget has no heart, and can't exceed its limits. Dull.

--"I can't tell her my real identity. It'll put her in danger!"  We get this phrase a lot in super-hero shows, and STARGIRL gives it to us quite a lot.  What, exactly, is the danger, please?  Yeah, the characters sometimes make noises about, "If she knew about my super-hero identity, she'd be a target for my enemies!" And how will that work?  You pull your mask off to your sweetie and say, "I'm a super-hero," and halfway across the city, the villain's head comes up. "Ah ha! Now I have my next target"?  How will the villains know that this person should be their target?  Yeah, no.  They don't.  If you trust X with your secret ID, you can also trust them to keep their mouth shut, especially if you say, "If the bad guys learn you know, they'll come for you, so keep this to yourself." It's just bad writing.  And Stargirl does this over and over as well.

SERIOUS SPOILERS
--The episode with Courtney's dad.  It was a supposed to be a tear-jerker when we learn Courtney's birth father isn't Starman after all, but is a low-grade member of a super gang.  To me, the episode falls flat.  First, we KNEW from the very first episode that Courtney's father isn't Starman.  The writers telegraph this big "secret" so badly that we all know about it the moment it first comes up.  And when Daddy finally does show up and turns out to be a manipulative dick, we can see it coming.  But throughout the episode, Courtney keeps asking Daddy, "Why did you leave?" And Daddy loudly and deliberately avoids answering the question. (See "denial" above.)  When he dodges, Courtney never says, "You didn't answer me. Why did you leave?"  And even when the truth is coming out, Courtney's mother never once straight-out says, "Your father isn't Starman.  He's this other guy."  Courtney never demands that Mom tell her who Daddy is, either, in defiance of all reality.  Everyone who has ever adopted a kid knows the day will come when kid says, "Who are my mom and dad?"  Courtney clearly wants to know, but the writers never have her ask.  It's unbelievable nonsense.

So next season, I'll probably watch something else.
stevenpiziks: (Default)
Since CBS All-Access made a pile of I LOVE LUCY episodes available, I've been binge-watching them.  I have . . . observations.

--It's great fun looking at the 1950s lifestyle, even if it's the Hollywood comedy version.  The historical and pop culture references (I had to look up who William Holden and Richard Widmark were) are also a lot of fun.  And it's interesting to look at the appliances and how housework was done.  We see the impact of "new" appliances like washing machines, dryers, and electric irons.

--This is definitely Lucille Ball's show.  You can almost see her standing behind the writers and the director saying, "This is MY show, bitch!  I get the last line, the last shot, the last joke.  I get the screen time.  You forget that for one minute, and VOOP! You're gone."  You can tell she ran that show with an iron fist.

--There's no television in the Ricardo living room. Although a couple episodes revolve around a television, the TV always quietly vanishes the rest of the time.  The Ricardos also make reference to a shower, but we never see a bathroom.  I can't even tell where it's supposed to be--there's no door anywhere on the set that would lead to one!

--The show never, ever has a subplot.  It's only one continuous story.  It's weird, to a modern viewer.  FRIENDS, as a counter-example, always had a B story and often a C story.  By modern standards, the show's plots are often slow, and the jokes spaces way far apart.  In an episode of FRIENDS, every line is a joke or a setup for a joke.  On LUCY, you can go four or five exchanges before someone says something funny.  I just watched one episode in which Lucy and Fred fall asleep on a ferry, and three full minutes are nothing but them sleeping in weird positions.  Expectations were different back then!

--The scene early where Ricky tells his son "Little Red Riding Hood" in Spanish is one of the funniest damn things I've ever seen, and it deserves a lot more recognition.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=re-k5m0OsTY

--A lot of the show wouldn't fly today, and is sometimes unnerving to watch.  Ricky threatens to hit Lucy many, many times.  Also many times, Lucy acts scared that Ricky will beat her when he finds out about her latest shenanigans.  And I've counted three times so far when Ricky literally bends Lucy over his lap and spanks her with a look of ghoulish glee on his face.  After one of these incidents, Lucy visits Ethel, who tells her to have a seat.  "I don't think I can," Lucy says in a pained voice, and she remains standing.  In other words, Ricky beat Lucy so badly she can't sit down. Holy shit.

--When the Ricardos move to Hollywood for a season, we get to see how powerful Lucille Ball was. The season sports an endless parade of A-list Hollywood stars, including the aforementioned William Holden.  The show has him get blasted with a tray of cream pies in a restaurant, and there's one shot of Holden sitting in his booth, covered in goo, and you can see he's desperately trying not to laugh--in no small part because if he did, they'd have to do it all over again! The scene was apparently an audience favorite because every time the Ricardos ran into another male star on the show, he'd ask, "Did Lucy really hit Bill Holden with a pie?"  (Also apparently, these stars lived in real-life terror that Lucy would require something equally sticky of them!) 

--The show was so popular that they got Rock Hudson to appear as himself in one episode.  The audience clearly didn't know he was coming--you can hear the gasps of surprise when he strolls onstage.  And here, your sharp-eyed reviewer caught something.  We all know today that Hudson was gay, and the studio guarded this fact strictly back then. Can't have your #1 box office draw and sex symbol be a poof!  But when Hudson appears on LUCY in a scene with a swimming pool, he strolls past a group of sunbathers.  As he passes by, in what seems to be a bit of improv, he stops and strikes up a brief conversation with a Handsome Shirtless Man, completely ignoring the Lovely Bathing Beauty sitting right next to him.  The studio must have had a whole litter of conniption kittens!  See for yourself:



--The breathless sexism in the show is staggering.  When Lucy and Ethel try to open a dress shop, it's a miserable failure.  When Lucy and Ethel get jobs in a candy factory (famous scene), it's a miserable failure.  When Lucy and Ethel start a mail-order business, it's a miserable failure.  Any time Lucy gets a job outside the home, it's a miserable failure.  Because, you know, she's a woman.  Lucy is expected to have Ricky's breakfast on the table, including fresh-squeezed orange juice, when he walks out of the bedroom in the morning, and she's expected to have supper on the table when Ricky gets home.  She doesn't do it because she's good at it, or because she's handling the home chores so he can work.  No, she's clearly doing it because HE EXPECTS IT and he'll be upset if she fails to do so.  Ricky also treats Lucy like a child when it comes to money. He gives her a literal allowance each week and he "audits her books" every so often. Lucy, of course, is terrible with money because she's a woman, and we know women can't handle money.  (I think it would have been funnier--and edgier--if Lucy handled the money and gave Ricky an allowance, but they had to keep this a secret so everyone wouldn't make fun of Ricky.)

--By today's standards, Fred it astonishingly mean to Ethel, calling her a cow, calling her fat (and she clearly ain't fat), carping and criticizing her every move.  She's no angel with him, either, but she rarely snarks about his appearance.  According to the stuff I've read, Vivian Lance couldn't stand William Frawley. She was outspoken that the studio shouldn't have cast someone twenty years older than she was for her husband.  I actually agree.  In an attempt to create a foil for Lucy and Ricky's happy marriage, they created a couple that come across as mean and spiteful to each other.  We never see moments of love or tenderness between Fred and Ethel, and we never see the reason they got married in the first place, especially with their age difference.  I think the studio should have cast a younger man for Ethel's husband and given them at least an occasional moment of affection.

--The show is still entertaining and funny and watchable, even after 65 years.


stevenpiziks: (Default)

I finally watched the final episode of ARROW.

I can't say I like the Canaries. If a show based on them actually reaches air, I might give it look, but don't know that I'll stay with them. Why?

Dull characters.

Two of the canaries are exactly alike. Except for hair color, both Dinah and Laurel look alike (same height, same weight, same body type, same makeup style), sound alike (for some reason, they both speak in a low, husky, whisky-soaked voice, and they both sound the same), same inflections (seriously, if you close your eyes, you can't tell them apart), same attitude ("Yeah, I'm a tuff bitch" while slouching on a couch), same drinking habits (sooooo much drinking from all the female characters), and even the same powers (martial arts with staff and a sonic scream that they inexplicably use only once or twice per episode instead of, say, during a fight).

Mia, meanwhile, is a tiny bit different from the other two. Her hair is different. She's younger. She uses martial arts and bow. And . . . well, that's it. Everything else about her is the same as the other two.

Apparently, TV has decided there's only one way to be a tough woman--you have to speak in a deep voice, love to fight, drink hard, have an in-your-face aggressive attitude. Oh wait--that's the stereotype of a tough man.

There are lots of ways to be a tough, strong woman. Putting three tough women on a show and making them all tough the same way is lazy writing--and boring.

Additionally, the stereotype Gay BFF (who will almost certainly be sidelined in every episode and given no steady love interest whatsoever) was barely a presence. No joy there.

So I doubt I'll watch the show again.

stevenpiziks: (Default)
I watched the first episode of DC Universe's TEEN TITANS with a wary optimism.  The previews weren't very good.  But I told myself that this is sometimes idiocy from whoever makes the preview.  As a Titans reader who still owns a NEW TEEN TITANS #1 comic from the 80s, I wanted to know what they were going to do with the team.

The short verdict is that it was pretty good.  Not great, but pretty good.

SOME SPOILERS FOLLOW

The badness?  Big-ass mistake putting Starfire into a hooker outfit.  That awful dress and that ratty fur coat struck the worst of the wrong notes in the entire musical scale.  Yes, she was apparently doing undercover work of some kind that required her to dress this way, but there were any number of things she could have worn.  The coat, which was deservedly maligned on-line, made her look trashy in a bad way.  This show is also very bloody, and not at all in keeping with the tone of the comic.  The Titans have always been a more light-hearted version of the Justice League, but they ran dark.  It's not done badly; I just didn't like it all that much.  And they changed Raven from a cool, confident woman with a deadly secret into an emo-goth girl who isn't very likeable.

The goodness?  Robin was perfectly cast.  The story is pretty good so far, and long-time readers of the book will have a pretty good idea of where this all is going.  I want to see more of Beast Boy, who barely got a cameo in the first episode.  I like their interpretation of Raven's soul self and how it works.

So I'm interested enough to keep on watching.
stevenpiziks: (Default)
Yesterday, Darwin and I were watching a Big Name Spy Thriller on DVD.  It had the same plot every other spy thriller uses:

STEP ONE: Spy Protagonist learns of an object he needs to get hold of in order to save the world or himself (called "the McGuffin").
STEP TWO: Spy rushes from exotic location to exotic location in search of the McGuffin while various Bad People try to kill him.  Various vehicle chases through crowded cities ensue. Much time is spent on Magic Computers.
STEP THREE: An Evil Person within the Spy's own organization, who is secretly employing the Bad People, tries to sabotage the Spy's efforts and nearly succeeds.
STEP FOUR: The Spy gets the McGuffin, kills the Bad People, and kills the Evil Person.

We want to look at the Magic Computers.

Goodness me, computers can do anything these days!  Especially in a movie.  According to the movie Darwin and I watched, in fact, a computer and its attached hacker can:

1. delete a thousand files from another computer in a split-second
2. shut off the electricity to a single building in a foreign country with less than a minute's work
3. track down a single person whose face appears on a traffic camera anywhere in the world seconds after his face shows up
4. grab control of a landline telephone and use that phone to take control of an unconnected laptop sitting a foot away from it (I shit you not--the movie actually had a CIA hacker do this)
5. enhance a distant, blurry photo of a woman into a photo clear enough to use on a magazine cover in less than a second
6. hack into one of the most secure mainframes in the world while the owners of said mainframe watch helplessly (why they don't simply unplug their modems goes unexplained)
7. instantly toss video and photo files to huge, Star Trek-style screens on a wall without anyone ever saying, "Hold it . . . hold it . . . dammit, the system is really slow right now . . . a couple more seconds . . . okay, here we go . . . "
8. instantly notice when a particular person even touches a computer anywhere in the world or accesses a particular file saved on a flash drive, but CAN'T TRACK A CELL PHONE!

Not one of these things is remotely possible today.  Number 4 had both Darwin and me in an outrage, it was so stupid.  And this movie (one of the Jason Bourne flicks, if you have to know) isn't in any way unusual.

Hollywood computers and computer operators can find out literally anything, in seconds, in ways that bear no resemblance to reality.  If you need to know it or find it, a computer will do it for you, no matter how outrageous.  All you need is a character who is supposed to be a "brilliant hacker."  ("Brilliant hacker" is code for "magician.")  Hackers and computers are basically witches with crystal balls.

It's become a bad trope.  True hacking or other computer ability takes years and years of practice.  You need to study code, spend weeks writing programs, make friends with other hackers and learn the seamy underside of the Internet.  It's an extremely precise field.  If you make a mistake, you'll get caught right quick, with dire consequences.  The field also changes every day, sometimes every minute, and you have to keep up.

But Hollywood treats computer work like musical talent.  You can sit the right person with the right talent down at a computer, and BAM!  Instant hacker who can get you exactly what you need to know.  It gets so bad that on SUPERGIRL, Winn went from low-level IT guy to having the ability to take down an alien computer system--with a virus he wrote in the nineties!  Because . . . talent, right?  Because there are people who can sit down at a piano and turn out amazing work with almost no experience, so it must be the same with computers, right?

No.  It doesn't work that way.  All the computer talent in the world won't grant you knowledge and precision.  Hollywood is just using a cheap trick.  As a writer, I can understand wanting a quick tool to push the story forward.  The Magic Computer will do that.  The problem is, Hollywood does it so often, and so badly, that it's become a bad, BAD cliche. 

And have you noticed that no one ever touches a mouse?  It's true!  Hollywood is all about fingers chattering on the keyboard.  In reality, of course, everyone--including hackers--spends most of their time with mouse and cursor.  A clicking keyboard is more dynamic on the silver screen, though, so Hollywood runs with it.  Except we've noticed.  (Now that I've pointed it out to you, you won't be able to help but notice it!)

Please, Hollywood--end the Magic Computer.  We know better.
stevenpiziks: (Default)
All my students were buzzing about the Netflix show 13 REASONS WHY.  I'd heard of it, of course.  I knew about the controversy.  And I knew, even without watching, that it in no way portrayed suicide accurately, and I had no desire to watch it. 

But then I found out a high school friend of mine, Brian d'Arcy James, was in it as the father of the suicide victim.  Brian mostly does stage work on Broadway (he's currently playing King George in HAMILTON), so I rarely get to see his work.  Most recently I saw him in the movie SPOTLIGHT, and it's always fun to see him perform.  So I decided to give 13 REASONS a look.

I lasted about five episodes.

I suppose I should warn about spoilers in the following, though the show has been out for months, and I don't see it as my job to protect anyone from plot spoilers after that long.  But I'll be nice. SPOILERS.

The show was absolutely awful.  Part of it, I'm sure, is that it does cater completely and unabashedly to the teenaged crowd, and there's really nothing in it for adults.  That's okay--I can enjoy a teen show on its own merits.  But . . .

The premise:  A teenage girl commits suicide (and the show was bad enough that I can't remember anyone's names, so I'm reduced to giving them epithets), and a few days after her death, a set of cassette tapes appears on the doorstep of the main character.  The tapes are an audio diary from Suicide Girl explaining, in detail, how thirteen different people drove her to kill herself, and, she says on the first tape, if you don't listen to all of them all the way through, something awful will happen.  "You're being watched," she says (feeding into the adolescent feeling of being the center of the world and that everyone is always watching you).

Okay, we all know suicide doesn't work this way.  Netflix was even pressured into putting a little disclaimer at the beginning of the first episode to this effect.  But a disclaimer doesn't stop me from thinking, "This would never happen" and "That would never work" and "This isn't remotely possible," which yanks me constantly out of the story and reminds me that I'm watching a fake for fake fakey-fake TV show.  I can't even pretend it might possibly somehow be a little bit real, which wrecks the viewing experience.

Suicide girl, you see, goes through some world-wrecking bullying at school which culminates in graphic sexual assault (I didn't get that far, but I read about it) that is so bad it drves her to kill herself, but she somehow manages to hold it all together long enough to formulate and execute an extensive, Machiavellian postmortem revenge  plan with dozens of moving parts that hold together without input from her.  She narrates the tapes in a chipper, snarky tone with no sign of being upset or unhappy. 

Seriously.  I have an easier time believing in an magical island full of warrior women created by Zeus, or a skinny kid from Brooklyn being transformed by a mysterious drug into a super-hero than this.  If Suicide Girl is so smart and savvy and together while putting this plan off, why doesn't she ask for help?  Or get her revenge while she's alive to see it?  Hell, why not just run away and leave the tapes behind as 13 Reasons Why I Ran Away?  None of it makes any kind of sense.  Easier to believe in giant apes living on an uncharted island than this.

The characters are also unlikable and uninteresting.  Every one of them.  There's Football Boy (the eventual rapist) who heads up a coterie of friends who hang out in his rich parents' pool house (which is bigger than most people's houses) and is for some reason worshiped by the entire student body (in reality, most students at a high school can't name the quarterback, nor would they care).  He drinks, does drugs, and beats up smaller students.  We also have Suicide Girl's Bitchy Best Friend, who gets into a fight with her over a boy (of course) and slaps her in the cafeteria.  We have Camera Kid who peeps into windows and takes pictures of Suicide Girl while she's dressing.  We have Asian Lesbian-in-the-Closet Girl who is being raised by two dads but is somehow too closeted to admit she is herself lesbian.  (WTF?  So being adopted and raised by two men turns you both gay and closeted.  I was ready to punch the fucking screen at that one.  Or just knock the writers' teeth so far down their collective throats that they could chew their own shit as it came out their asses.)  We have Miscellaneous Teens who spread half-naked photos of Suicide Girl around with their phones and make fun of her about it.  I wouldn't have wanted any of them in my classroom, let alone in my life--or on my iPad.

And we have Doormat Boy, the viewpoint character.  He receives the tapes and starts listening, but can't bring himself to listen to more than five seconds at a time before anxiety takes over and he has to stop.  Here's where things become even more unbelievable.  Doormat Boy, we learn, is something like the ninth or tenth person to get the tapes.  The tapes have been passed around from teen to teen, and everyone keeps asking Doormat Boy if he's listened to "his" tape yet (the tape that talks about his role in Suicide Girl's death).  When he says he hasn't, the asker always shouts, "What are you waiting for?  You have to listen!!"  But Doormat Boy can't do it.  And why?  Because if he did, the show would be over.  The show needs him to listen to one tape per episode.  So, against human nature and every bit of reason in the universe, Doormat Boy listens to one bit at a time.

Doormat Boy always does what the person next to him says.  Suicide Girl orders him to be her friend, and so he does.  Football Boy's friends pressure him into drinking, so he chugs a beer.  And, of course, Suicide Girl orders him to listen to the tapes on the first cassette, and he does.  I heard that later he starts standing up for himself, but I wasn't willing to wait for it.

Suicide Girl herself is a nasty little bitch.  She's mean and snarky to her friends.  She walks all over Doormat Boy.  She calls him names (the fact that she calls him by a series of demeaning nicknames instead of his actual name turns into a running joke).  Whenever she asks him for advice and he gives it, she says something cruel to him in return, and when he finally gets up the gumption to protest about it, she simpers at him and walks away.  She starts arguments with her friends and parents over inconsequential matters just to have drama in the episode.  Bitchy, nasty, unlikable.  If I was supposed to feel sorry she was dead, by Episode 5 I wasn't.

I also couldn't swallow the idea that no one tells anyone else about the tapes.  Ten-odd teens have gotten hold of these tapes, and they've told their friends about them, but NOT ONE PARENT has learned of them?  No.  Just no.  Someone would talk about it to an adult.  Or an adult would find the tapes by accident and give a listen.  Or they'd stumble onto their teenager listening and demand to know what's going on.  ("Why are you listening to a tape?")  There's no way something like this would remain a secret when this many people know about it.  I've seen it in action.  Just last week at school, a kid kept spraying stink bomb aerosol in classes as a prank.  It was supposed to stay a huge secret who was doing it.  But within twenty minutes, someone ratted him out.  Someone ALWAYS talks.  Always.  The tapes would be public knowledge in a matter of hours.

And why DOES everyone do what Suicide Girl says on the tapes?  Sorry, hon, but you're dead.  You don't get to reach out of your grave and tell other people what to do.  If I got a bunch of cassettes from a dead person that said, "Go to Spot A in town and listen," I MIGHT continue listening, but I definitely wouldn't go to Spot A to do it.  My overall instinct would be to return the tapes to Suicide Girl's parents, untouched, or maybe to erase them and throw them out.  I certainly wouldn't obey orders from beyond the grave, if for no other reason than a feeling of "Fuck you."  Yet on this show, every single person follows orders.  Another point of disbelief.  No one erases the tapes or throws them away or says, "Fuck this!"?  Sure.

And Brian's role as Suicide Girl's father?  Well, he was barely given enough screen time for me to form an opinion.  He's an adult in a teen drama, so he'd shown up in maybe four scenes by the time I stopped watching.  I'm glad he got the chance to be on what's inexplicably a hit show, though.

When I got halfway through Episode 5, I realized I was watching the show out of a sense of duty more than any enjoyment, and that I actively disliked bringing it up on Netflix.  There was nothing redeeming in the show, nothing fun or interesting to watch, nothing that made me look forward to more.  The show actively pissed me off, in fact.  I decided to remove the show from my queue, and you know what?  I felt a strange sense of relief. 

No more banal adventures of Doormat Boy and Suicide Girl.
stevenpiziks: (Default)
Google Home has a new ad that (supposedly) features a same-sex married couple with children.  Let's have a look, shall we?


I'm glad they're showing this, I suppose, but I'm seeing the cowardly cop-out.  Let's take a media literacy look, shall we?

Firstly, all throughout they use odd camera angles, foreground objects, and blur to confuse and hide. The camera hides us behind water glasses, pans across blurry people, and looks upward from weird angles. This hides what's going on, in case you're offended by it.

Then, when Man #1 enters, he's blurred out and he walks behind yet another foreground water glass. Then we pop to shot of Google Home sitting on the table, and another blurred person walks in front of it. Man #1 wants to know about his day, and a shaky-cam shudders and shimmies while we get a shoulder touch--just a teensy one. Wouldn't want to show any real affection, would we? Nor would we want to show a gay man touch his children at the breakfast table, for fear of anyone screaming "Molester!"

We pop back to GH on the table, surrounded by more blurry objects, then a shot of the kids surrounded by blurry water glasses, then a shot of Man #2 surrounded by blurry water glasses as he asks about his day.  Blur, blur, blur.

The camera pans sideways to push Man #1 out of the shot so we don't see the guys together for too long--wouldn't want that!  Then a shot of Man #2 framed by blurry children as he offers to "take the kids."

Then we have the big moment!  The camera pans left in order to center the blurry boy in the middle of the screen so his whole head takes up the screen just as Man #1 zips by Man #2 for a good-bye kiss--WHICH WE DON'T SEE because it's blocked by the Giant Blurry Boy Head.

Did Man #1 actually kiss Man #2? We can't tell for sure, and Google is too chicken to say.

Then another shot of kids and blurry water glasses, and we end with a brief, semi-obscured shot of Man #1 and Man #2 as Man #2 rushes off with the children.

The commercial is a clever piece of cowardice that Google pretends is bravery. If they get too much flak, they can claim that the men are brothers or even roommates. If they get support and praise, they can say the men are married.  Cowardice. We expected better, Google.

stevenpiziks: (Outdoors)
Netflix has remade the 80s sitcome ONE DAY AT A TIME.  The difference?  The working-class single mom now heads up a Cuban family.  Grandma lives with them, and she's played by (surprise!) Rita Moreno.  Schneider isn't so much the building super as a slightly batty trust-fund baby who has nothing better to do than to hang out with the family.

It's a fun show, and I'm enjoying it.  It takes a number of issues facing the Hispanic (Cuban) community head-on: preparing for a quinceneras; families split up by deportation; veterans and the VA; veterans and PTSD; discovering a teen child is gay; figuring out how to balance being Cuban with being American.  Lydia, the grandmother, has a particularly poignant story about her role in the Pedro Pan flights from Cuba in 1962.  Like all families, they fight, make up, worry about money, deal with divorce, and hide and reveal secrets.  The main point?  This Cuban-American family is just like yours.

The show is well worth watching.
stevenpiziks: (Outdoors)
I finally watched the Supergirl-Flash crossover episode.  It was everything a super-hero teamup show should be--fast, funny, heart-felt.  The villains (Livewire and Silver Banshee) teamed up, too, so we had a two-fer.

The fun of a teamup isn't to watch two heroes combine their powers in a fight.  The fun is to see how the characters will interact.  Kara and Barry are both naturally bright, sunny people who want to help, but in slightly different ways, and the episode showed us the joy in not only putting them together, but also in dropping Barry into the supporting cast.  Usually I hate jealousy subplots, but Kara and Barry making James jealous was funny instead of embarrassing or cringe-worthy, and the way Cat egged Kara on about it like a tart-tongued maiden aunt was worth watching several times.

Many people said the best line in the show came when Cat called Kara and company a racially-diverse cast from a CW show, but for my money the funniest part came when the Flash faces down Livewire and Banshee with Kara and says, "Let's settle this like women."

And when Kara flung herself in front of Livewire's power bolt to save the helicopter, and the people of National City rallied around her, and the firefighter Kara had saved earlier came to her rescue, all to show that her accidental rampage from last episode was forgiven . . . we were happy to see an episode show us what super-heroes are meant to do--inspire us to be heroes ourselves.

The show was clearly meant to be the anti Batman v Superman. "Look!" CBS was shouting.  "This is what super-hero teamups can be! No grimdark here, and it's still highly entertaining."  And . . . well, they were right.
stevenpiziks: (Outdoors)
We have to take a moment to comment on how much we disliked--very well, hated--this last episode of Supergirl.  The main reason?  Indigo.

That, and stupid plotting.

(There will be spoilers.)

Indigo (played by Laura Vanderoort, the actress who was Supergirl on SMALLVILLE) was a villain-of-the-week, a relative of Brainiac. It was she who guided Kara's pod to Earth, for reasons that aren't made entirely clear in the episode.  She hates humans, also for reason that aren't made clear in the episode, and has decided to wipe them out.  Her method of doing so?  A single nuclear missile aimed at a single city.

Okay, then.

The trouble we have with Indigo isn't her concept--we're willing to take on an alien who wants to destroy humanity.  The trouble we have is how the character is handled.

First, we have her costume design.  Look at this thing:

Supergirl, Laura Vandervoort

The skin-tight body suit broke "no sexism" rule on Supergirl.  We've had a number of male villains, and not one of the THEM have strutted about in a bulgle-enhancing singlet.  But this character slinks around in tight blue spandex.  Sexist in the extreme.  But it doesn't stop there.  During the episode, we learn that Indigo has been having an affair with Kara's uncle Non.  Indigo is really an advanced computer program, and Non's sexual relationship with her reduces her to the level of mere sex toy, a glorified blow-up doll.  Can it get worse, you ask?  Why yes, it can.  After Indigo's inevitable defeat (by a man--Kara stands by helplessly and watches while Winn impossibly saves her), we cut to Non's laboratory, where he is laying out Indigo's chopped-up body on a table, cooing to her, "I only broke your heart. ... Are you ready to do it my way?"  It was creepy and disgusting, and not in the way the writers intended it.  If that hadn't been the last scene, I would have shut the episode off at that moment.

Speaking of Indigo's costume, could it be more obvious they're ripping off Mystique from the X-Men movies?  The character in the comics looks nothing like this design, so the show's choices are obvious.  Cheap, cheap, cheap.

Then we have plot holes galore.  The hero characters figure out Indigo wants to launch a nuclear missile through a completely impossible leap of logic that I couldn't follow even after I backed up the DVR and re-watched the scene.  It was absolute nonsense, and it was obvious they'd taped it quickly and hoped the viewers wouldn't notice.  We did.

They make a big deal out of the fact that the missile silo had no Internet access, and the general Indigo is tracking would somehow allow her to gain access to the silo when the guy arrives there.  When the general shows up at the silo, his iPhone (product placement!) rings. He wonders loudly why he's getting a signal.  He answers it, which allows Indigo, who can travel through computer signals, to zip through the phone and appear at the silo.

Except if cell phones don't normally get signals out at the silo, how did the general's phone get one?  If Indigo's control over computers somehow forced a signal, why would she need the general?  She'd only need to force-activate any radio-controlled device at the silo and wouldn't need the general at all.  And why was the general stupid enough to answer his cell phone in a highly-classified, hidden missile silo in the first place?

But now Indigo has taken over the missile silo and starts up the launch sequence.  Suddenly Winn, our resident computer genius, conveniently reveals to the good guys that several years ago he wrote a super virus that could take Indigo out.  (Why an Earth computer virus written years ago by a guy in a basement could hope to touch a Kryptonian super-computer that ran an entire civiliation, I can't imagine.  Good thing the Kryptonians didn't use IOS.)  All Winn has to do is upload the virus to Indigo and she'll be powerless!  Winn starts the upload.

Uh, guys?  Remember how a major plot point of the story is that THE SILO HAS NO INTERNET?  How is Winn uploading the virus?  This is not in the least bit addressed.  Major, major plot canyon. But the virus uploads merrily away, despite the lack, and we're expected to go along with it because Winn is just so handsome. Or something.

The fight scenes were also awful.  It looked like the actors couldn't remember their moves and were on the verge of losing their balance.  Usually the show's fight scenes are pretty good, but tonight they on NyQuil.

Sickening sexism, horrible writing, bad fight scenes--this episode has it all.  The "Spock's Brain" of Supergiril.
stevenpiziks: (Outdoors)
I watched THE BIG BANG THEORY for this week.  You know--"The Positive Negative Reaction," the episode when Bernadette tells Howard (and everyone else) that she's pregnant.

Holy crap!  Were the writers drunker than usual?

I don't usually comment on THE BIG BANG THEORY.  I usually enjoy the show, despite its enormous flaws, though I'm starting to think the show is winding down.  This week's episode certainly showed it.

The episode starts off with Howard learning he's going to be a father. And what happens?  He freaks out.  Just like every single sit-com (and most non-sit-com) father-to-be does.  The standard, idiotic junk poured out of his mouth--I don't know what to do, everything will be awful, yada, yada, yada.  The episode revolved around him deciding that having a baby was a good thing, despite the fact that Howard has been campaigning to have a baby with Bernadette from the beginning.  So in addition to the stereotyping, Howard's freak-out made no character sense.

Later on, Howard laments to the other guys that they won't have enough money.  Money, money, money.  They're going to need money!  Except the show has long since established that Bernadette makes an enormous lot of money, way more than Howard does.  Additionally, they recently inherited Howard's mother's house--so they don't have a mortgage, the single biggest expense a couple can have.  They own their own house near Pasadena, California?  Holy crap!  These people are rich!  Howard doesn't need to worry about money.  It's just the writers grasping at straws.

And then the gals and guys end up in a bar singing karaoke at each other and at Bernadette's unborn baby.  Many, many minutes of it.  None of it was particularly funny.  Nor was it tear-inducing tender (as Howard's love song to Bernadette was at their anniversary).  It came across as the sawdust filler it was.

It was as if the writers wrote half a half-assed episode and went out to the bar, stranding the actors on stage to do bad improv for the final fifteen minutes.
stevenpiziks: (Outdoors)
I have a tough standard for judging TV shows: they have to keep me occupied while I'm on the treadmill.  I don't like running, so a TV show that distracts me from the pain has to be =good=.

THE FLASH and SUPERGIRL keep me occupied nicely.  Good pacing, lots of action, lots of humor.

ARROW . . . has trouble. So much angst!

Seriously.  Way much.  In every episode, the plot screeches to a halt at least twice--and often more--in order to let a set of characters tear their hair out about how rotten their lives are.  Nearly all the characters are so wracked with ten kinds of guilt that it takes a third of the show to discuss it.  I could actually live with it, except IT'S BORING.  While someone wails and whines, I'm reminded that we're only on minute 13, and I have 30 minutes of pain to go.

And why is the angst boring? Because there's so freaking much of it!  Episode after episode, hour after hour, we have guilt trips, unrequited love, weeping, hair-tearing.  Come on, people!  You're bloody SUPER-HEROES!  Get your acts together!

So I find myself putting off ARROW.  Maybe I'll just let it quietly fade away.

But here's the cool thing--ARROW used to be the only live-action super-hero show on TV.  Since it was the only game in town, I had to watch it if I wanted a super-hero fix.  But now we have a number of super-powered heroes on TV.  I actually have a choice!  I can let a show go and not feel like I"m missing something.  I would have killed for this kind of thing when I was a kid.

We are in the awesome age of television.

Supergirl

Nov. 13th, 2015 03:44 am
stevenpiziks: (Outdoors)
Yes, we like Supergirl.

Why?  Melissa Benoist is the main reason.  Her Supergirl is earnest and trying hard to do a job she knows is probably too big for her, but dammit, she's going to do it anyway.  She also =likes= doing it, and =wants= to do it, a major switch from decades of reluctant "I hate my life" heroes (including Buffy, Batman, Green Arrow, and Smallville's Clark Kent).  This makes her highly empathetic.  We also like the fact that her costume design doesn't have a boob window, Daisy Duke shorts, or crop top.  And we like the fact that she doesn't really know how to fight.  Kara bludgeons her antagonists into submission.  No martial arts moves, no fancy acrobatics--just smash and punch.

And we like the references to the source material.  Will Win Schott turn out to be the Toyman?  Will we see the Fortress of Solitude?  James Olson has been given a makeover that we like (though I have to say I would have liked a big redhead for . . . personal reasons).  Cat Grant's iditoic original past as a gossip columnist has been dumped and she runs a media empire with an iron fist.  Interesting.

So we like Supergirl and will continue watching.
stevenpiziks: (Outdoors)
Darwin loves horror movies.  I don't.  However, I drag Darwin to super-hero and action movies, so I put up with the occasional horror movie.

When I learned American Horror Story was featuring Lady Gaga this season, however, I thought it'd be cool.  Darwin could watch horror, and I could watch Lady Gaga, and we'd both win.  Plus--Kathy Bates!  I set the DVR to record the show, and when a few episodes had stacked up, Darwin and I settled in to watch.

Aaaand we didn't like it.  Didn't even get past the first episode.

The fish-eye lens (meant to mimic a hotel peephole, I suppose) got annoying really fast.  And every protagonist-type character acted like an utter idiot.  The two girly tourists in the opener had a hundred chances to escape, but took none of them, and in fact, did nothing but whine and scream.  The police detective showed up to investigate an emergency call with no help, even though we saw him work with an entire team just one scene earlier.  All the victims give in without fighting.  This horror trope I loathe more than any other, and this show has it over and over and over.  No one ever fights back or manages to get away?  Really?

Yeah, I know the storyline is meant to be outrageously Gothic, but style got in the way of story.  Many of the shots were so darkly lit, you couldn't see what was going on, and then when we shifted to the vampire child playroom, with the outdated video games, the change was so jarring, it jolted me out of the story and shouted, "Look! We're on a set!  Isn't the design cool?"

Even Lady Gaga's outrageous sense of style couldn't save it.

Darwin agreed with me.  We shut it off and deleted the recording.

Ah well.  There's always Supergirl.
stevenpiziks: (Outdoors)
I watched the premiere of MUPPETS TONIGHT.  And oh!  I was happy with it!

I love the mockumentary format.  It effortlessly flips from the Tonight Show style show the Muppets are running to the drama backstage to talk-to-the-camera snippets and back again.  The format leaves a lot to explore.  They can have mutliple guests, if they want (and they did on the pilot), or they can have just one.  They can have short sketches or long, and they did.  And it was inspired to have the musical guest play during the end credits.  When I watched THE MUPPET SHOW back in the 70s, a musical guest always meant the show came to a screeching halt while the guests played, and I hated that, but this let the musicians play, interact with the Muppets (in this case Animal and Sweetums), and wrap up the show all at once.  Brilliant!

Miss Piggy is the host of the show, with Fozzy as her announcer.  Again, brilliant.  Miss Piggy's snark and temper make her a hilarious interviewer, and I don't know why they haven't done this before.

Kermit, meanwhile, is running his flippers off as the show's producer.  He's no longer the host, and it works.  He has more than enough to do backstage, and we see him trying to juggle a show that involves so many disparate personalities, to great comic effect.

The heart of the show remains Kermit and Piggy and their long backstory.  They've broken up, and the flashback scene where we see it happen is strangely tender and tearful.  It contrasts hilariously -- I keep using this word -- with Kermit's confession to the camera, "I guess I've always been attracted to pigs."

It is fresh, it is funny, and we will continue watching.

M*A*S*H*

May. 3rd, 2015 11:18 am
stevenpiziks: (Outdoors)
M*A*S*H* is now out on DVD. I got the first disc from Netflix.

Couldn't even get through the first episode.

The show hasn't aged well.  I found Hawkeye annoying rather than funny or poignant--funny, perhaps, twenty or thirty years ago, but not now.  The show was heavily sexist and even misogynistic. Sure, you expect a certain amount of that from a show set in the 50s and filimed in the 80s, but when they did the montage of Hawkeye stalking a nurse he likes by hiding in her tent, in her duffel bag, in her locker, and even going after her in the shower, and she accepts this with a sigh and a shake of her head rather than a butcher knife, I became disgusted.  Major Houlihan was actually looking like a voice of reason, calling Hawkeye out on his bad behavior, but she's portrayed as a shrill harpy--and also a slut.  In fact, all the women are on the show to smooch it up or sleep with the men.  The stupid-ass laugh track, a staple of sit-coms from the period and accepted back then, grated on my nerves.  And when the main plot of the pilot settled into raffling off a nurse as a fundraiser, I had to stop watching.

I know the show got better as it went on.  I know that once Colonel Potter showed up and they got rid of dull, wimpy Blake, the show picks up and that once Frank Burns goes away and Winchester shows up the show improves further, but there are so many other shows to watch, and I realized this is one I don't really need to revisit.

Profile

stevenpiziks: (Default)
stevenpiziks

June 2025

S M T W T F S
12 3 45 67
89 1011121314
1516 1718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 18th, 2025 08:05 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios