stevenpiziks: (Default)
 Whenever someone says to me, "Why isn't there a straight pride parade?", I always respond, "So organize one. What's stopping you?" Now this event was announced:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/dozens-attend-hetero-awesome-fest-in-idaho/ar-AA1Hafxf

Make no mistake, though: this event isn't a celebration of heterosexuality ; it's a denigration of the queer community. The tone is not, "Heterosexuality is awesome! We're happy to be straight, and we're celebrating it!" Not at all. The tone is, "Thank god we're straight, because queer people are perverts and pedophiles who want mutilate children's body parts."

The festival organizer reached out to companies to sponsor the festival, and each company gave him some version of, "We only sponsor 501-3C charity groups." So he registered his group as a 501-3C. The result? He got three or four small sponsors.

On the day of the festival, this happened: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/dozens-attend-hetero-awesome-fest-in-idaho/ar-AA1Hafxf

You read that right. "Dozens" of people attended. The bands played to a mostly-empty park of dully-dressed white people, many of them openly carrying. (Side note: if I were a woman, I'd be seriously wary of attending a festival that celebrates heterosexuality with a bunch of armed men standing around.) The festival was a dud.

When it ended, the organizers set up a GoFundMe page. Why? Because the festival was figuring on ticket sales for most of its budget. Few people showed up, so the festival owes $18,000 in various bills.

This guy is not only a homophobe, he's an idiot. You don't organize a festival this way. You start small, with eight or ten booths from local businesses and artists and a couple of rented rides for kids in a local park. You only pay the park fee and the ride rentals. You hope to make some money back by selling concessions and asking for donations, but you figure you'll be out of pocket for a while.

Publicity consists of flyers and posters around town (another OOP expense) and social media. If you don't have a robust social media following, that's an indicator that few people are interested in your event, by the way.

If the event draws a decent crowd, celebrate it and do it again. If the event draws more people than you anticipated, cheer and use the momentum to expand the festival next year. And the next, and the next, until you have a large thing going.

If the festival sputters, you try again next year. If it still sputters, it's clear that 1) the only person interested in your event is you; or 2) you suck at organizing events; or 3) both.

This guy is so self-centered that he missed the key idea: Gay Pride caught on because an entire community of people had been beaten down and made invisible for generations. The sense of anger and outrage that every single LGBT person has felt bonded the community together. Pride is a way to fight back.

Heterosexuals don't have this feeling of community. Straight people haven't been downtrodden, beaten, burned, or murdered for being straight. There's no sense of community in this arena to bring people together. When the only thing you have in common is that you're straight, it's hard to find anything to bond over.

Anyway, this guy is an idiot.
stevenpiziks: (Default)
 Hegseth has ordered the navy to rename the ship HARVEY MILK. Milk was a prominent gay activist, navy veteran, and mayor of San Francisco. He was murdered in 1978.

It's navy tradition to name oiler-class ships after civil rights activists. It's also very taboo in the navy to rename a ship. Navy memos show Hegseth ordered the renaming of the HM during Pride Month on purpose.

They want us gone. They want us dead. They want us destroyed and forgotten.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hegseth-orders-navy-rename-ship-honoring-gay-rights/story
stevenpiziks: (Default)
By most definitions, I'm not a video game fanatic. I don't have shelves of games and ten different platforms. I play only on my PC, and I tend to play one or two games, and that's it. Right now, those two are Baldur's Gate and City of Heroes.

But even a dilettante like me has noticed the changes.

The first video game I remember playing that had an actual story to it was Adventure on the Atari platform. Remember that one? You were a little cube wandering through different screens, able to carry a single object--a yellow arrow that was supposed to be a sword, or a blocky key. You were bothered by a mischievous bat that would steal your object and menaced by 8-bit dragons that would swallow you and end the game, all during your attempt to return a blocky glowing chalice to a blocky gold castle. The game was a best-seller, and my brother and sister and I played it over and over.

Now the game seems silly and simplistic, like a Model T or a rotary phone.

Games continued to evolve, though. Graphics improved by leaps and bounds. Computers got faster and memory got bigger. And we finally got full-blown animated characters, 3D worlds, and rich storylines.

But when story-based fantasy games like Final Fantasy and Zelda and Dragon Age came out, they kept up strict guardrails on character creation. Very few choices about what your character could look like, and very binary gender choices. The males were all manly men, the women were all womanly women. The games also included romantic subplots in the stories. Your avatar could romance certain characters in the game--or not. Your choice. These romantic choices were all strictly heterosexual. Absolutely no hint of male/male or female/female romance. Building-sized dragons, sorcerers with world-changing spell, and minotaurs charging into battle? No problem. A man kissing a man? That's too ridiculous to consider.

Also, the major mainstream games had no adult content. With the exception of the deliberately over-the-top Grand Theft Auto games, every story was, at most, PG-13. Characters could kiss. Sexual activity took place off-screen and wasn't discussed. No nudity.

"Well, yeah," said the big video game companies. "Kids and teenagers are the majority of our market, and we don't want to piss off their parents. And those right wingers boycott you and Wal-Mart won't carry games with adult content anyway. Besides, adults will still play teen-oriented games, so why should we include content for adults at all?"

It was really Walmart, though. WalMart dictated content for everything. Publishers of books, magazines, and video games NEEDED WalMart to carry their stuff, because everyone shopped there. You cut your own throat by risking WalMart's wrath. Book covers and blurbs were designed with WalMart sensibilities in mind. Video games wrote for children and teens. If you broke the rules, WalMart wouldn't carry your stuff, and you were relegated to niche markets in small gaming stores.

But games like The Sims started sneaking in LGBT content. Just hints of it. Players scratched their heads. "Is that character ... gay? Huh." The internet remained uncertain, but the game sold well.

Then, some ten years ago, one of the Dragon Age games allowed a male avatar the chance to romance two male characters. One of these characters was a flaming queen, and the other was a huge, hot-tempered minotaur, done up for comedy relief. But they were there.

Parts of the internet lots its collective shit, of course. The trolls howled. Parents snatched up their children and ran to church. Wal-Mart refused to carry the game. 

And it didn't hurt sales one bit.

See, society had changed. Same-sex marriage was legal. We were starting to see gay and lesbian kisses (well, lesbian, anyway) on TV. LGBT storylines were becoming cool.

And something else had happened. BioWare (maker of Dragon Age) released the game both as a disc and as a download, meaning you didn't have to go to the store for it. And anyway, if you still wanted the disc, Amazon would ship it to you overnight. Who needed WalMart? Fuck you, Sam! 

I also think the game creators realized that they had been trapping themselves in hetero-centrist thinking. It simply hadn't occured to them to allow a male avatar to romance a male character or a female a female. But finally someone said, "And why not? The non-player-character's dialogue would be exactly the same, whether the avatar is male or female. It's actually EASIER if we write the game to be gender blind. Besides, we have same-sex marriage in the real world. Why shouldn't we have it in our fictional world?" And so it happened.

Sexual content and nudity also crept in. Holy crap! Adults like adult content in their video games! Who knew? And who has more money to spend on video games, adults or teenagers? 

Yeah.

Along came Baldur's Gate. Character design that lets you play any type of body. You can be cis-gender, transgender, non-binary, or anything in between. You can even customize the character's genitals. (!) Turned out the option of playing a female-presenting character who also has a penis became an astoundingly popular choice. Your avatar can romance any character, regardless of gender. And very explicit sexual content. 

The game broke sales records all over the world and won countless awards.

Oh yeah--WalMart carries it. Guess their principals don't stand up to the chance at profit. 

Now BioWare has released the newest Dragon Age game. It also allows highly-customizable characters and sports gender-blind romances.

It's freaking awesome. I would have committed cheerful murder for even a speck of gay content in a video game when I was growing up and when I was a young adult. The chance to play Someone Like Me? Wow. 

It does highlight how bad things used to be for LGBTQ people, of when we were invisible even to entertainment. But the days of retailers dictating content are gone. WalMart doesn't have the near-monopoly it used to. We've become visible.

Now? Let me put it this way. When I mentioned the LGBT content of Baldur's Gate to the students in the Gay/Straight Alliance at Nameless High School, none of them had heard of it. 

Let that sink in. This level of LGBT content has become so normal that it can be overlooked! A long, long way from the firestorms a hint of gay content once created.

These days I only read books with gay protagonists. I'm catching up after decades of being forced to read about straight people. And now I can play gay men all I like in video games, too. I've played Baldur's Gate several times through with different avatars, and I've never once romanced a female character, not even to see what happens. After decades of being forced to have straight romance or nothing, I can have all the gay content I want. It's fan-fucking-tastic.

As I write this, my computer is downloading Dragon Age: The Veilguard. I'm going to build a male who's good-looking by my standards and pay attention to romantic overtures only from male characters. Because I can.

And I'll slay some dragons, too.

stevenpiziks: (Default)
 This simultaneously makes me laugh and pisses me off:

https://www.rawstory.com/grindr-2668764731/

TL;DR: Usage at the hookup app Grindr is spiking in Milwaukee because of the RNC.

Funny? Sure is. All those men who howl that they're straight, straight, straight get away from their wives for a week and they're ready to climb into bed with a different guy each night.

But.

These are men who have joined a party that is doing its best to destroy LGBTQ people. At best, this party wants us swept aside and ignored. At worst, it want us dead. And these men loudly support all that while they quietly have sex with men.

Why do they do this? I really can't say. Maybe they value power--or a slim chance at it--more than they do their own lives.

Maybe they're psychopaths and have no empathy for their fellow LGBTQ people.

Maybe it's the allure of the forbidden and they don't understand--or refuse to try--that giving in to this allure while claiming to be straight is lying to themselves.

Maybe they figure being in the RNC will benefit them economically but don't want to be rejected socially, so they make an outward show of heterosexuality.

Maybe they're self-loathing gay men who outwardly try to be straight but give themselves a weekend pass to indulge their true selves when they're out of town.

Maybe they were raised in GOP families and are too scared to come out (which I can understand) and go all-in with the anti-gay party to reaffirm their public heterosexuality (which I can't).

Or maybe they're just selfish, self-centered asses who have decided the GOP will benefit them somehow and are willing to sacrifice the rest of us for that.

Whatever the reason for their behavior, it's not merely offensive. This is the worst of cowardice, hypocrisy, and selfishness. If they're too scared or feel they aren't in a position to be publicly gay, I get that. Not everyone can be openly gay, even today. These men can join the GOP publicly and quietly vote Democrat in the privacy of the voting booth. But giving money to GOP candidates? Attending the RNC? Campaigning against LGBT rights? What the hell are they doing?

Over the years, I've met a number of men who are married to women and say that they're straight, but they slip out for a quickie with a guy once in a while. Their reasons are varied and interesting. "My wife won't have sex with me, and it's easier to deal with a guy on the side--women want dinner and drinks and romancing, but guys get straight to business." "I wouldn't want to marry a guy or even kiss one, but sometimes you just need oral from someone who knows what they're doing, you know?" "I'm straight, but every few months, I just want a guy to bend me over the bed. I don't know why. But I'm definitely straight."

That's cool, gentlemen. Everyone has their thing. But you don't get to have your thing while working hard to hurt a community you're part of, whether you acknowledge it or not.




Wedding NO

Jun. 11th, 2024 06:39 pm
stevenpiziks: (Default)
I have a bunch to say about this one:

https://percolately.com/coming-out-during-cousin-wedding/

First, NO! You don't use your cousin's wedding as a coming out moment. Just, no. It's forbidden, taboo, verboten, just like announcing an engagement at a wedding is also forbidden. Just NO.

(Side note: Why would you, Mr. Closeted Gay Man, want to put your boyfriend through this? It's awkward enough meeting your SO's family the first time. Why on earth would you add your own coming out to the mix? NO! Come out before the wedding, or come by yourself.)

Second, never EVER issue +1 invitations. No, no, no. If you think Cousin Vicky will want to bring her boyfriend of three weeks and you don't mind if he's there, he gets an invitation of his own. With his first and last name on it. +1 invitations foolishly hand control of the guest list over to a bunch of other people, and you don't know what'll happen.

Third, grow a spine, Miss Bride. You want to have a small, immediate-family wedding only. Great! It's at your aunt's house, though, so she needs to be invited. Well, all right. And that means all the other aunts and their husbands have to be invi--

Record scratch. No! No, no, NO! If Aunt Thelma will allow the wedding at her house only if she can invite a truckload of other people, you thank her kindly for the offer and look for somewhere else to celebrate.

This woman needs to grow a pair of ovaries. If her family and her fiancé's family are going to be this intrusive and controlling about the wedding, what are they going to be like when the couple starts having children? Jeebus! Use the wedding to set your boundaries, or your household will never be your own.
 
stevenpiziks: (Default)
 A couple days ago, I came across a small business owner who does car detailing, and he works weekends (which is great, since I kind of need my car during the week). I messaged him and got a little more information and then he asked if I did want my car detailed. I said I did, and my husband would, too.

Silence.

It's been four days, and still no further response.

I can only conclude that he doesn't want to take gay money. What a dumbass.

Pride 2023

Jun. 10th, 2023 11:39 pm
stevenpiziks: (Default)
Fifty-four years ago this month, police raided the Stonewall Inn, a refuge for the LGBTQ+ community in Manhattan. It wasn't the first time but, that night, led by Black and Latino patrons, they said, "Enough!" Despite the threat of losing their jobs or homes because of who they were and whom they loved, they protested and sparked the modern LGBTQ+ rights movement.

Millions of Americans have continued to fight to not only live authentically and love whom they love — but to simply exist. We've seen incredible progress in the years since Stonewall, but constant efforts to turn back the clock continue. Extreme Republicans in states across the nation have passed new laws to further restrict the rights of LGBTQ+ people, while others are attempting to erase their existence entirely. So this month, I want to encourage you to celebrate Pride with our LGBTQ+ community and show care and compassion for yourselves.

I also hope you'll take action. We stand at a critical moment where the rights that LGBTQ+ people have won in the courts could easily be erased. And today, too many still face the threat of being evicted or denied services for who they are. Vote for politicians who support equality. Attend local school board meetings and tell the board you demand inclusion of LGBTQ materials in the classroom and the library. Donate money to LGBTQ causes (the ACLU, the Triangle Foundation, the Human Rights Campaign). Be vocal with your friends, family, and co-workers about your beliefs in LGBTQ equality. All these little steps taken together can make great strides forward.
 
stevenpiziks: (Default)
 
On Wednesday, the Michigan House voted in favor of adding sexual orientation to Michigan's civil rights law. The bill has already passed the Senate. Governor Whitmer is expected to sign it. This means it will be illegal to discriminate against LGBTQ+ people based on their orientation or what gender they present as.
The opposition complained that the bill doesn't make an exemption for "sincerely held religious beliefs," though none of the speakers in question explained why religious organizations should be allowed to discriminate when no one else can.
At any rate, this is hugely good news! Michigan has become a safer place for LGBTQ+ people!


www.mlive.com/politics/2023/03/michigan-to-codify-lgbtq-protections-into-states-civil-rights-act.html

All Closed!

Jan. 6th, 2023 10:22 pm
stevenpiziks: (Default)
Darwin and I have been having trouble with restaurants lately. They see us coming and close their doors.

At least, it feels that way. On Tuesday, we wanted takeout for dinner. We called the restaurant, and got no answer. We tried a few more times, and still no answer. So we decided to go out. On the way, we passed the takeout place. A sign said they were closed today. No other explanation. Huh. 

We arrived at the second restaurant. It was also closed. The hell? We finally went to a dumpy Coney Island place that was actually open.

Today I got home very late and very hungry and very crabby. No cooking. We drove to a restaurant. Closed. I was getting crabbier. We drove across town to yet another restaurant, hunted for a parking place, and walked two blocks through cold drizzle.

Restaurant closed.

What the ever-loving-fuck?

In this last case, there was a restaurant across the street that I really like but Darwin doesn't (which is odd--the restaurant floridly caters to the LGBT community).

It was open.

And so, at least, a meal.

stevenpiziks: (Default)
Resurrection Men is a great book for the Halloween season. Autumn, abandoned graveyards, sneaking around in cemeteries, costumes, thrills, and chills! Reviews are coming in, and they're universally awesome!

"Extremely engaging and swiftly paced. Nicely balances macabre history with heartwarming relationships. " --David Nelson

"
Arthur and Jesse are compelling characters and the romance feels legit. Lots of fun and a little dark Michigan history trivia to boot. Highly recommend!" --Christian Klaver

"
Impeccably researched with engaging characters and a captivating plot, this one’s a must read." --Sarah Zettel

"
The pacing of this historical novel is perfectly balanced, from desperate action to the sweet, slowing unfolding of a deep connection between the two men. Historical details create a vivid setting that heightens the stakes, drawing the reader ever deeper into this compelling story." --Deborah J. Ross

How about an excerpt?


CHAPTER ONE

            A resurrection man watched the funeral, and his expression was hungry. He stood behind the huddle of funeral-goers clustered around the grave and didn't speak with anyone, which was how Jesse spotted him. A dead giveaway, so to say. Jesse stared at him from the corner of one dark eye. The resurrection man wasn't yet twenty. Brown as a dead tree. Straight brown hair under a frayed brown cap, long nose, sharp jaw, long brown coat mended twice, worn brown shoes that were nonetheless carefully polished. Someone who was used to hiding who he was.

            The resurrection man met Jesse's eye for a flick. He had good eyes, that one—clear and blue and strong—and Jesse touched his cap in salute. Jesse had a gravedigger's build, wiry and a little short, able to throw an eight-pound shovelful of dirt six feet toward heaven, and he could hold his own in a fight against two men half again his height. The resurrection man was taller, whipcord, and Jesse bet he wore gloves to keep his hands clean when he robbed night-time graves. No one who saw him by day would know what he did at night.

            When their eyes met, blue on brown, it created something interesting and indefinable, like that boundary moment when water touches a burning coal, or warm ocean air brushes a chilly shore. The resurrection man looked away. Jesse clicked his tongue in mischief—and the chance to make some money.

            The coffin rested on a pair of beams set across the grave Jesse had dug only that morning. Jesse always put a scattering of sawdust and a few pine branches in the bottom of his graves so the coffin wouldn't rest on dirt. It made no difference to the deceased, mind you, but it made the family feel better. Two solemn boys pulled the beams away, and the pallbearers lowered the coffin with ropes braced around their necks like pulleys while the preacher said his final bit. While all this was going on, the resurrection man slipped away, confirming Jesse's suspicions that the man was a grave robber who knew the best time to leave was when the family was occupied.

            As the family drifted off, Jesse barely overheard a man and a woman in conversation. The woman murmured, "He won't get up and come after us, do you? He's stubborn enough to try."

            "Jesus, I hope not," the man muttered back. "That copper-plated sumbitch was bad enough when he was alive. I can't think what he'd be like, lurching around, dead."

            Death brought out the truth among the living. Jesse looked in the direction the resurrection man had taken and gave himself a private nod. It was going to be an interesting evening.

            Jesse finished filling the grave of Mr. Elmer Pitt (b. 1803, d. 1889), then went home to the little shack he occupied at the edge of Highland Cemetery, made himself a pot of strong coffee on his bachelor stove, dropped a slug of Irish in it, and waited until sunset. When the early autumn night slid in cozy among the gravestones, Jesse put his shovel back over his shoulder and strolled toward the grave of Elmer Pitt. There was time to enjoy the walk and think about how to spend the money he would shake out of the resurrection man. It had been a while since he'd passed a good night's drinking and fighting at a pool hall. Or maybe he'd buy a new pair of boots.

            The trek was easy. Didn't matter that it was dark. Jesse had dug plenty of graves in Highland Cemetery and knew the place like the end of his shovel. He even had a map of the place tacked to the wall of his shack, with every grave picked out in careful precision. People thought that graveyards laid out the dead in neat, cornfield rows, but Highland's graves made a swirling mosaic that twisted around the hills and trees, creating stars and flowers and teardrops that only God and Jesse's map could see. Jesse had taken over as the main gravedigger in Ypsilanti from Mr. Suggs two years ago. Mr. Suggs himself currently rested in a grave well back from the road that Jesse himself had dug with extra care. Jesse didn't run the cemetery—that job belonged to the great and gloomy Frederick Huff, who issued daily orders from the caretaker's house and only emerged to complain at Billy Cake and the other fellows who worked the cemetery. But it was Jesse who dug the graves.

            Highland Cemetery had opened twenty-some years ago, a bit before Jesse was born, and it had stolen away all the business from Prospect Cemetery. Didn't seem to matter that Prospect was half a mile closer to downtown Ypsilanti, with its growing Normal School and expanding railroad system. Prospect still failed to prosper.

            Problem was, Prospect had both proven too small, so the city had bought a big chunk of loamy hillside outside Ypsilanti and named it Highland Cemetery. The local Catholic community had been scandalized at the idea of sharing eternity with Protestants and even Lutherans, so they had bought a bit of land right across the road for their own dead, keeping Mr. Suggs, and now Jesse, busy digging graves for both. Meanwhile, the townsfolk stopped using Prospect Cemetery entirely, and no one seemed interested in paying Jesse Fair or Billy Cake to even trim its trees, so these days the verge ran wild. The inhabitants didn't complain.

            It was a serpent night, with the chill breeze hissing in the leaves. Jesse wound through the stones until he came to the new grave of Elmer Pitt. The thin glow of a little lantern on the ground illuminated the markers from the bottom up, and the familiar quiet sound of a wooden shovel biting earth came to Jesse's ears. Resurrection men always used wooden shovels. They made less noise. Jesse crept closer.

            The resurrection man had already made good headway and was knee-deep in the ground at the head of the grave. Two canvas drop cloths lay beside him, one to catch the dirt and the other to receive Elmer Pitt. Jesse noted the well-worn leather gloves covering the resurrection man's hands. The man also had a crowbar and a length of rope.

            "So you're from the University Medical School," Jesse said in the dark.

            To his credit, the resurrection man didn't drop his shovel or even shout. Instead, he turned and focused sky eyes on Jesse. Mud stained his trousers.

            "You knew I'd be here," he said simply.

            "Haven't seen your kind in a while," Jesse said. "They passed that law a few years back that says paupers and prisoners go to the anatomy lab, which means the dead poor and the poor dead get a free train ride to your dissecting table. Last I knew, there was no end of dead paupers, so what brings you down here to my cemetery?"

            "We still run short of bodies now and again." The resurrection man went back to work. He was digging at the head, which was why he'd attended the service—he needed to know which way Mr. Pitt was pointed. "I saw the funeral notice in the paper and came on down."

            "What's your name, friend?"

            The resurrection man stopped his shovel again and sighed. "Are you going to call the constable, sir, or just empty my pockets?"

            Jesse had been about to name a figure, one that would give him a delightful evening's entertainment and leave him with a fine morning's hangover, but something stopped his tongue. Something in the other man's posture, his face, his eyes. Jesse cocked his head, and a coyote grin crept across his face.

            "Depends." Jesse stuck out a hand for the resurrection man to shake. "I'm Jesse Fair."

            "Uh ... Arthur. Arthur Tor."

            The coyote grin widened. "Does it bother you to dig up bodies for that fancy medical school over in Ann Arbor, Mr. Tor?"

            "It does." Arthur's shovel bit the ground again. "I had to kill a dog to dissect during my first term, and I don't mind telling you, my hands were shaking for an hour afterward. Still, I did it. Now I'm doing this."

            Jesse cocked his head. "Why?"

            "We have to learn anatomy somehow." Arthur's voice was weary, the sound of someone who had explained this a hundred times. "We cut up the body of one person who died, and hundred other people get to live. And I have rent to pay. Why do you care, if you intend to turn me in?"

            "Just wanted to see what you would say." Jesse stepped into the head of the grave with Arthur, close enough to smell cemetery sweat. "Move over, Mr. Tor, and I'll show you how a gravedigger digs."

stevenpiziks: (Default)
 TOM SWIFT is the first CW adventure show featuring a Black gay man as the lead character. We all had high hopes for it. Now the CW has announced its cancellation.

Why? The ratings were, frankly, shitty. No one was watching. Was it because of the gay Black lead?

No.

The show was awful. It really was. I could see what they were trying to do, but it was all done ... badly. Tom himself simply wasn't very engaging. I didn't really much care about his personal struggles. The networked hyped that he was gay, and they did make it very clear that Tom was gay, but his relationship with his sort-of boyfriend ... failed. There was no chemistry between them. Meanwhile, Tom does show serious chemistry with his bodyguard Isaac, but Isaac also has a thing for one of the women on the show. It looks like the studio wanted both a love triangle AND a "will they/won't they?" couple. What they got was a half-hearted, uninteresting tangle.

I also looks like the studio thought Tom's thing for cars and shoes would make him a cool-guy icon, but that didn't work, either. Yeah, there are the sneaker-heads, but most male viewers don't care what kind of shoe the character wears, even if it has some kind of tech embedded in it, and most female viewers don't care about men's shoes. And the cars such obvious product placement, it was painful. Also, the guy who gets to choose which multi-million dollar car he drives from an entire garage of them automatically becomes less relatable. I didn't envy Tom for his cars, nor did I wish to be him. I only felt he was spoiled.

The overall stakes are too low, or perhaps too abstract. In the first episode, Tom's father boards a Saturn-bound ship that Tom himself built, but the ship explodes after it reaches Saturn. At first, Tom--and everyone else--thinks Dad is dead, but Tom learns his dad is still alive and that a global conspiracy (sigh) sabotaged the ship. Tom now has to rush around the country trying to gather what he needs to rescue his stranded father. The trouble here is that, once the ship explodes, we don't see Dad. We don't feel that he's in danger. And he isn't. The show makes it clear that Dad has plenty of oxygen and whatever else he needs to survive until rescue comes, and in the series, Tom goes off on long, non-Dad tangents, and doesn't seem to be all that concerned that his dad is stranded in space. We have a "we'll get around to it" feeling here. Additionally, Tom doesn't like Dad very much, and for good reason. Dad is cold, homphobic, and plain ol' bitchy to Tom, who would frankly be better off without him. The viewer is left wondering why Tom is so bent on rescuing him at all.

The world-building was also lacking. The show is set in modern-day America, but Tom somehow has access to Star Trek technology--a faster-than-light drive, nanobots, easy retroviruses, and of course, an omniscient AI that malfunctions whenever the plot requires it. Tom's inventions show up lightning-quick, too. In one episode, Tom is able to whip up a miracle drug from some tree sap in just a few minutes. Star Trek can get away with it because of the far-future setting. Tony Stark in the Marvel movies can get away with it because of the super-hero setting. But for this show, the viewer is forced to wonder why all this fantastic tech hasn't made its way into the mainstream.

We also have no decent antagonists. The antagonist is a nebulous conspiracy called The Road Back. The heavy hitters in the organization are, frankly, bland. The group's aims are vague, but they seem to want to roll technology back to prevent ecological disaster. How is this a bad thing? Their members also act with astounding stupidity, which Tom himself fails to take advantage of. In one late-season episode, Tom is talking one-on-one with a tiny, Hollywood-thin woman who is a heavy-hitter in Road Back. She possesses a bit of tech Tom needs to rescue Dad, and she snottily refuses to tell him where it is. I watched this, thinking, "When is he going to grab her and force her to talk? When is he going to conk her over the head and tie her up in the basement until she talks? She's a third his size, has no bodyguards, no weapons, nothing, and she's making threats. Come on, Tom! Get her!" But she simply walks out of the room, leaving Tom shrugging helplessly.

Bad world-building, unsympathetic characters, no romance. It all equals a bad show.

 




stevenpiziks: (Default)
This evening after supper, Darwin and I decided to go for ice cream. Because we could.

The closest ice cream place to us is Go Ice Cream. It's a retro ice cream parlor, complete with counter and stools inside and spindly metal chairs outside. All the ice cream is made on site--the kitchen and its shiny equipment are visible through plate glass windows--and the selections rotate every week.

It's freakin' fantastic. The best ice cream I've ever had, anywhere.

Darwin and I took a pleasant 10-minute drive to downtown, where we easily found parking, and we strolled to Go Ice Cream. The summer air was soft, and other people were wandering about. The ice cream parlor is down an alley strung with lights, giving both a modern and a retro feel. I ordered Banana Brulee and Darwin got Three Bean Vanilla. We settled on a bench outside, enjoying the weather, the retro view, the ice cream, and each other's company. When we were done, we decided to buy a pint and a pair of GIC's huge ice cream sandwiches. It was a fine mini-date.

This is what I love about summer.


stevenpiziks: (Default)
Holy crackers! The Michigan Supreme Court did it!

https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/2022/07/28/michigan-supreme-court-law-bans-discrimination-sexual-orientation/10175560002/

This is huge. Absolutely huge! It not only sets law for the State of Michigan, it creates a precedence for the rest of the country. People in other states can cite this to get similar rulings in their own states.

And note that the majority (5-2) opinion was written by a Republican-nominated judge.
stevenpiziks: (Default)
It's been a big year for giving.

Every year at this time, Nameless High School runs a gift drive. The school pairs with an elementary school that has a high incidence of students who receive free or reduced lunch.  These students often have few or no Christmas presents.  The young students make a list of things they need and things they want. The lists are then distributed to volunteer families at Nameless, and they buy presents.  The student council delivers the presents with the help of UPS, and while the kids are out at recess, they set them up around the kids' desks.  When the kids come in, they find a pile of presents waiting for them.  It's a huge, huge event that always ends in hugs and emotional moments.

This year, Nameless decided to expand the program to include teachers and staff at the elementary school, and they wanted teachers and staff at Nameless to get presents.

I went down and selected a teacher from the list, though about it, and decided also to select a custodian. So we'd have two people.  Darwin and I spent most of a Saturday afternoon shopping for them. The custodian's information said he rode his bike to work every day, but it's in bad shape and he'd like a new one. So we found one for him.

When I brought the presents into the student council's storage area, I checked the list and saw there were a whole lot of unclaimed staff and teachers.  I consulted with Darwin and we decided we could take on a couple more.  So we did--a tutor and the school librarian. I delivered those gifts this morning.

Meanwhile, a few days ago, Darwin and I were out having breakfast at a local diner.  While we were waiting to be seated, a woman who was there with (I assume) her husband and grand-daughter was trying to pay her check, but her card wasn't going through. She was becoming more and more unhappy, and she was asking if there was a nearby ATM just as the greeter was showing us to our table.

"I feel bad about that lady," Darwin said.

"Yeah," I agreed.  "She's in a tough spot. I don't think her card was being declined because there's a problem with it. I think she has less money than she thought or something."

"I'm going to go take care of it."  He got up and left.  A few minutes, he came back and reported that he had paid the woman's bill.  She was in tears.

That's why I married him, folks.
stevenpiziks: (Default)
The big deal about THE ETERNALS is that it's the first Marvel movie with a gay super-hero in it, one who is married, with a husband and son.

I really wanted to like it.  I tried to like it.  I couldn't.

(Light spoilers follow.)

The Eternals are a group of immortal super-beings, each with their own power--matter transmutation, super-speed, mind control, illusion, flight and strength, and so on. They were sent to Earth by another being, a Celestial, to stop monsters called Deviants from wiping out the human race.

The movie itself is unfortunately and deeply flawed.  Like I said, I really wanted to like it, and I tried, but nothing really worked.  At the beginning, we're dropped into an action sequence in the stone age. A Deviant kills a man in front of his son, and the boy doesn't even react.  In fact, when the Deviants wipe out a big chunk of the village, no one really seems to mind much. The boy, who should have been frightened and traumatized, expressionlessly accepts the gift of a knife from one of the Eternals instead.

This set the tone for the rest of the movie.

The Eternals are outside humanity, supposed to be apart from it. And most of them are hard-bitten and even uncaring. Ikarus, the male lead, spends most of the movie stony-faced and rigid. He's in love with Sersi, but he never seems to take joy out of that. He doesn't seem to get joy out of anything, really.  Sersi seems to feel the same way--their relationship is a burden, not a support, and she puts up with it because she feels she should, rather than out of any real romantic attraction.  Sprite, the mischief-maker, also rarely cracks a smile, and uses her illusions for workaday heroics. We never see her get any =fun= out of her powers.  Kingo, a blaster hero, seems to be the only one who likes what he's doing, but even he turns overly serious halfway through the show.  The actors decided that immortality has hardened the characters and made them either less than or more than human.  An interesting choice, but it means the characters feel remote, and I couldn't connect with them.

There was an attempt to humanize Sersi by giving her a human boyfriend, but it actually makes the problem worse. The boyfriend--whose name I'm forgetting--takes the news of Sersi's true identity with sarcastic resignation, the world-weary sigh of someone who's already seen super-heroes stop world-wrecking events. His low-key acceptance is, perhaps, different, but it's ultimately off-putting. He was a chance to inject some humanity in the show, and that chance was thrown away.

Director Chloe Zhao also seems to have little idea of how to pace a story. Just when the movie gets some momentum going and the tension builds nicely, she stops the story dead for long, long minutes so the characters can emote at each other. I found myself checking my watch, never a good sign. The time-hopping structure of the story (starting in the distant past, jumping back to the present, popping into the past again) makes this worse. It's hard to keep track of what's going on, and we have to put the present storyline on hold every time we're plopped back into the past again.  It's another momentum-killing device.

And then we come to Phastos, the much-heralded First Gay Movie Super-Hero.  He falls flat.

This isn't the fault of Henry Tyree, the actor who plays him.  Tyree does a great job.  It's the script and the director who fail the character. First, make no mistake, Phastos is a minor character. He's absent from most of the movie, in fact. After the first few scenes, the Eternals basically split up and scatter around the world. Later, Ikarus and Sersi travel around the world, trying to reunite them so they can fight a new threat.  This could have been done quickly, much in the way Paul Neuman picks up grifters in THE STING. Instead, Zhao slowly, frustratingly takes. Her. Time. We have a long, long, LONG scene partway through the gathering process in which the characters gathered so far share a meal.

Guess who isn't there yet?

At LONG last, the characters get off their asses and look for Phastos. They find him in a suburb with, to the surprise of his fellow Eternals, a husband named Ben and their young son.  We have a set of family-oriented scenes here that, I think, are meant to normalize a same-sex relationship, but the relationship itself is dry. Everything is too matter-of-fact. Like Sersi's boyfriend, Ben doesn't seem much affected by the revelation of Phastos's true identity, and when he learns Phastos needs to leave them to go fight evil, Ben sends him off with a smile and a quick, dry kiss of the sort you give your husband when he's going away for a two-day conference.  There was no attempt whatsoever to show romance or, heaven forbid, passion.  (And I have to point out that Sersi and Ikarus, our straight couple, get an extensive and passionate lovemaking scene.) 

Later, after the Great Big Battle, the Eternals come back together, but do we get a scene in which Phastos is reunited with his husband and son? Do we see Ben and Phastos fling themselves into an embrace with thank-god-you're-okay-I-love-you-so-much? Do we seen Phastos's son leap into his arms shrieking "Daddy!"?

No, we don't.  Instead, we blip to a farmhouse.  Phastos is in a living room eating pizza. Ben is nowhere to be seen, and their son is in the kitchen, talking to another Eternal. Later, Ben pops in to deliver one line, and Phastos decides to rush into the kitchen, but not to talk to his son, whom he deliberately pushes aside, but to talk to his team-mate.

It drains all emotion from the scene.

This is doubly problematic in a movie that stutters and stammers because the plot gets interrupted for emotional emoting for emo emotions. Zhao is willing to sacrifice pacing so her straight people can emote at each other, but she won't do the same for her gay folk.

A few audience members did shout and clap during the kiss.  I just shrugged.  It could have been--should have been--much better.

It's abundantly clear Disney/Marvel is testing the waters. They decided we could have a gay man, but he couldn't be =too= gay. We could have a same-sex marriage, but it has to be completely, blandly domestic. We could have two men who are married, but they have to keep romance and passion off-screen.  It has to be bland and boring in order to exist at all.

I'm glad we have a gay super-hero in the Marvel movies. I'm hoping it leads to more of them.  I suppose it's inevitable that the first one is botched.  But I'm tired of feeling that way.

I wanted THE ETERNALS to be an awesome movie, with an interesting, fast-paced story with a prominent and heart-felt gay relationship. I got something entirely, and disappointingly, different.
stevenpiziks: (Default)
When last we heard about the Pride flag fight, the HOA was still telling us to take it down, to which Darwin and I replied, "The rules say we get a hearing with the board when we're accused of a rules violation. We haven't had a hearing yet."

And we didn't hear anything else.  For weeks.  We wondered if the HOA had decided to drop the issue.

Nope!  We finally got a text from K---, a board member, who offered us a hearing on a particular Tuesday evening.  R--, the president, and J--, the board member who had started the Pride flag fight, wouldn't be there, which I found very interesting.  However, the other three board members would attend, and that constituted a quorum.  Darwin and I agreed to the meeting.

We weren't sure where the board would land with this.  Darwin and I had a number of arguments marshaled--that the board had failed to enforce the flag rule when other co-owners violated it and we were clearly being targeted due to our sexual orientation; that J-- had made a number of blatantly discriminatory and homophobic comments about us and our Pride flag while speaking as the board vice-president; that the board had only changed the flag rule to make it more restrictive when our Pride flag went up, which meant they knew our flag wasn't a violation.

Additionally, remember, we're the guys who arranged for the rescue of the feral kittens living under the shed.  I was careful to post flyers, complete with adorable kitten photos, around the complex to update everyone on what had happened. So if the board ruled against us, they would be ruling against the guys who help stray kittens. Not very good for the board's image!

Finally, if the board ruled against us, we intended to take the flag down for a single day, then put it back up.  When the inevitable complaint came, we planned to say, "The complaint about our flag came in under the old flag rule, and that complaint was only recently resolved. If you feel we're in violation of the NEW flag rule, you can create a complaint, of course--and start the process from the beginning. Do note that this includes sending a hard copy letter to us by registered mail, and we will demand yet another board hearing.  And the rules and regulations say that the first violation of any rule results in no penalty whatsoever.  Just thought we'd say."

(Side note: a second violation results in a $25 fine.  Ooo!  If it went this far, Darwin and I planned to continue flying the flag and requiring the HOA to go through every single step from the beginning, including holding more hearings.  It would totally be worth $25 to make them jump through hoops.)

Anyway, we had all this set up and ready to go.

And then we got a text from K---.  The meeting was being postponed.  He didn't say why, and he didn't give a postponement date. 

Darwin and I think one of two things happened. Either a board member had a conflict with that time (and without at least three board members, they can't conduct business); or at least one board member said, "Why are we doing this? No one cares about the damn Pride flag except J--. Just drop it!" 

It's been a couple weeks, and we haven't gotten a notice about a new meeting time.  And the Pride flag continues to fly.
stevenpiziks: (Default)
I read comics obsessively until I was in my late 20s. I subscribed to a couple dozen books. I stopped because the writing standards went down, and the prices went up. I picked up the odd issue here and there out of idle interest, but read nothing regularly, and last year I sold my collection.

Now, for the first time in 25 years, I've subscribed to a comic book again. Here's why:https://www.npr.org/2021/10/11/1044002955/superman-son-comes-out-queer-dc-comics



I can't tell you what this would have meant for me if this had happened when I was a kid. Seeing it on the page made it possible, made it =real=. More than that, seeing Superman with a boyfriend, made such a thing . . . not just acceptable, but DESIRABLE. Something it was okay to want.  The world's greatest hero wants the same thing you do.

So I'm reading.


stevenpiziks: (Default)
The fight over our flag has continued.

It started when we flew a Pride flag from our balcony. A couple-three weeks later, we got a notice from the management company of our condo that said our flag was a violation of the rules and regulations. I pointed out to the company that the rules and regs only regulate American flags. Other flags, including Pride flags, were not mentioned.

We knew that our neighbor J---, who is also the HOA vice-president, was unhappy that our second-story flag was flying higher than his first-story American flag. And he's generally homophobic anyway.  He filed the initial complaint.

This touched off an explosive fight, mostly via email.  A couple days into the whole affair, J--- was standing down on the boat dock a few yards away from the condo balconies. He was talking loudly to another neighbor, and he told her that HIS flag stood for patriotism and THAT flag stood for a sexual preference, and they were going to change the rules to forbid THAT flag.  I wrote it all down.

Darwin and I got really pissed.  J--- is allowed to be as homophobic as he likes in private life, but in this case, he was clearly speaking as a member of the HOA board, and he was making hate speech against a fellow co-owner.

The board met--without informing anyone else that they were doing so--and apparently they voted in a new flag rule, one that forbade all flags except the American flag.  We were served notice from the HOA's lawyer that we had to take our flag down immediately.

We shot back that both the original flag rule and the new flag rule stated American flags must be flown according to the US Flag Code, which, among other things, states that flags may not be flown if they are worn or torn and that at night they must be taken down or lighted.  The new rule also stated that all flags must be 4'x6'.  But several residents were flying worn American flags, didn't take them down at night or light them, and flew a whole bunch of smaller flags on their boats and balconies, and no one filed complaints about that. We were being singled out over our sexual orientation.

We also pointed out that the rules and regs clearly state that anyone accused of a violation can call for a board hearing, and we were officially calling for one. In the meantime, though, we took the flag down.

After a whole bunch of angry back-and-forth via email, R--, the HOA president, and K---, a board member, asked if we could meet informally to talk about the matter.  We agreed, and the four of us met near the kitten shed.  It was a long, sometimes angry, talk. I told them what J-- had said, and Darwin pointed out that the board wasn't being fair and evenhanded in enforcing the rules. I also said that the board had the power to change the rule at any time. Would R-- ask the board to do so?

R-- dismissed J--'s hate speech with a, "He's old school Baptist, and it's just the way he is" and said he had no intention of asking the board to change the rule.

A few days later, I put the flag back up.

Within an hour, I got an irate text from R--. "I thought we'd resolved this," he said.

"We haven't had our hearing yet," I shot back.  "In the interest of convenience, we're willing to wait until the next board meeting."

That was a week ago.  We haven't heard a word since.  The Pride flag continues to fly.

I'm wondering if the board is sick of dealing with the time and expense. (Every time they consult with the attorney, it costs money--and they've consulted with him a LOT.)  Have they decided just to drop the matter?  We'll see.
stevenpiziks: (Default)
Darwin and I have been flying a Pride flag on our balcony for several months now. Today, we got this email:

Steven and Darwin,

I was on-site on Tuesday and noticed your flag, according to the Rules and Regulation booklet, the only flag that can be displayed at Hidden Harbor Condominiums is the American Flag. We do realize you are new to the condominium and may not know all the by-laws, but if there are questions, please feel free to ask.

Attached is the deed restrictions and rules and regulations booklet you should have in your possession. We ask that you please remove your flag immediately.

Thank you for your cooperation,

R--- & S--- [property managers]

Hmmmm . . .

I went through the documents he sent me and sent this reply:

Hi, R--- & S---!

I'm afraid I don't see where the bylaws state that ONLY the American flag may be flown. The bylaws state:

"Co-owners may display the American flag, in accordance with US Code & Michigan State Law upon their exclusive use limited common element." (The rest of the paragraph is devoted to the display of a flag on common elements.)

So the bylaws say an American flag may be flown on our exclusive use limited common element--in this case, our balcony. The bylaws do not say no other flag may be flown. Thanks for your attention!

--Steven and Darwin

All nice and gentile.

But Darwin got royally pissed:

R-- and S--:

I left a voicemail message for you at your office today. As I inquired in my message, did you also request our next door neighbor to remove his Blue Lives Matter flag from his pontoon boat? If your company and Hidden Harbors Condominium Association insists on pursuing this matter, we intend to file a fair housing sex discrimination complaint with the Michigan Department of Civil Rights, since we believe that your company and the condo association are targeting us due to our sexual orientation. We do not intend to remove our flag absent a court order to do.

Darwin D. P. McClary

We haven't heard from them about the matter since. The flag continues to fly.

Profile

stevenpiziks: (Default)
stevenpiziks

June 2025

S M T W T F S
12 3 45 67
89 1011121314
1516 1718192021
22 232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 4th, 2025 05:58 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios